Nonlinear, three-dimensional, finite element models of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal stem-cement bond were developed with use of a Charnley stem geometry and a modified Charnley stem geometry that had a cylindrical cross section over the distal two-thirds of the stem (Distal-Round)
Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components
✍ Scribed by Rudi G. Bitsch; Sebastian Jäger; Marcus Lürssen; Travis Loidolt; Thomas P. Schmalzried; Michael Clarius
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 325 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0736-0266
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In clinical outcome studies, small component sizes, female gender, femoral shape, focal bone defects, bad bone quality, and biomechanics have been associated with failures of resurfacing arthroplasties. We used a well‐established experimental setup and human bone specimens to analyze the effects of bone density on cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components. Thirty‐one fresh frozen femora were prepared for resurfacing using the original instruments. ASR™ resurfacing prostheses were implanted after dual‐energy X‐ray densitometer scans. Real‐time measurements of pressure and temperature during implantation, analyses of cement penetration, and measurements of micro motions under torque application were performed. The associations of bone density and measurement data were examined calculating regression lines and multiple correlation coefficients; acceptability was tested with ANOVA. We found significant relations between bone density and micro motion, cement penetration, cement mantle thickness, cement pressure, and interface temperature. Mean bone density of the femora was 0.82 ± 0.13 g/cm^2^, __t‐__score was −0.7 ± 1.0, and mean micro motion between bone and femoral resurfacing component was 17.5 ± 9.1 µm/Nm. The regression line between bone density and micro motion was equal to −56.7 × bone density + 63.8, R = 0.815 (p < 0.001). Bone density scans are most helpful for patient selection in hip resurfacing, and a better bone quality leads to higher initial component stability. A sophisticated cementing technique is recommended to avoid vigorous impaction and incomplete seating, since increasing bone density also results in higher cement pressures, lower cement penetration, lower interface temperatures, and thicker cement mantles. © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 28:986–991, 2010
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract During a study of bone mineral density changes around cemented femoral implants, we recognized heterotopic ossification occurring regularly in a position anterior to the greater trochanter and proximal femur. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence, distribution, and effect
## Abstract Bone loss around femoral hip stems is one of the problems threatening the long‐term fixation of uncemented stems. Many believe that this phenomenon is caused by reduced stresses in the bone (stress shielding). In the present study the mechanical consequences of different femoral stem ma
## Abstract Total hip resurfacing arthroplasty (THRA) is being performed with increasing frequency for osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH). To evaluate femoral bone remodeling in ONFH after THRA and determine the impact of stem‐neck angle (SNA) of inserted femoral component on bone remodeling, we
## Abstract Bone loss in the proximal femur at the time of revision hip arthroplasty for a failed primary cemented femoral component can substantially reduce the stability of the revision stem, Use of an extended‐length femoral component has been suggested to aid in achieving long‐term fixation; ho