## Abstract Upon immunization with phosphorylcholine (PC), conventional BALB/c mice produce anti‐PC antibodies bearing predominantly the idiotype characteristic of the BALB/c PC‐binding myeloma protein TEPC 15 (T1 5). To investigate whether BALB/c mice are able to produce antibodies to the autologo
Induction of T and B cell immunity by anti-idiotypic antibody
✍ Scribed by K. Eichmann; K. Rajewsky
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1975
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 678 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0014-2980
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A small dose of the IgG~1~ fraction of anti‐idiotypic antibody (āId 1) raised in guinea pigs against a strain A/J antibody specific for streptococcal Group A carbohydrate sensitizes A/J mice against Group A streptococci. This is opposed to the previously established suppressive function of anti‐idiotypic antibody of the IgG~2~ class (āId 2). Correspondingly, āId 1 but not āId 2 is eliminated from the circulation in the way typical of an immunogenic molecule. However, the stimulatory component in the IgG~1~ fraction is not necessarily itself IgG~1~ antibody.
Sensitization occurs in both B and helper T lymphocytes and is specific for Group A streptococci. In the B cell compartment sensitization is restricted to precursor cells expressing the idiotype. The concomitant activation of T helper cells therefore suggests that these cells make use of receptors with a similar or identical idiotype.
Efficient sensitization by āId 1 of both T and B cells is also demonstrated in strain C57L/J mice which upon immunization with Group A streptococci express a partially cross‐reacting idiotype as a minor component. When such animals were primed with āId 1, essentially all of the anti‐carbohydrate antibody carried the partially cross‐reacting idiotype.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Previous investigations have suggested that pairs of peptides specified by complementary RNA sequences (termed complementary peptides) can interact with one another. In the light of this finding, we hypothesized that an antibody directed against a peptide might interact with an antibody against its