In vivo versus in vitro assays for assessment of T- and B- cell function
✍ Scribed by Martin F. Bachmann; Thomas M. Kündig
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 885 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0952-7915
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
As mice deficient in a particular gene provide an increasing number of novel in vivo models, in vivo assays that examine immune function are becoming a central issue. We found that the sensitivities of in vivo and in vitro assays are strikingly different. These differences have important implications for the interpretation and biological relevance of results.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract 4‐1BBL^–/–^ mice have a defect in recall CD8^+^ T cell responses to viruses, whereas CD4^+^ T cell responses to virus are unimpaired in these mice. In contrast, both CD4^+^ and CD8^+^ T cells respond to 4‐1BB ligand (4‐1BBL) __in vitro__. To clarify the role of 4‐1BB/4‐1BBL in CD4^+^ ve
## Abstract Antigen‐specific high zone unresponsiveness to two thymus‐dependent antigens, TNP~560~KLH (2,4,6trinitrophenylkeyhole) limpet hemocyanin and TNP~6~FGG (2,4,6trinitrophenylfowl IgG), was induced __in vitro__. It was found that carrier recognition was required for its production, and