In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests
β Scribed by C. Pailler-Mattei; S. Bec; H. Zahouani
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 501 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1350-4533
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Knowledge about the human skin mechanical properties is essential in several domains, particularly for dermatology, cosmetic or to detect some cutaneous pathology. This study proposes a new method to determine the human skin mechanical properties in vivo using the indentation test. Usually, the skin mechanical parameters obtained with this method are influenced by the mechanical properties of the subcutaneous layers, like muscles. In this study, different mechanical models were used to evaluate the effect of the subcutaneous layers on the measurements and to extract the skin elastic properties from the global mechanical response. The obtained results demonstrate that it is necessary to take into account the effect of the subcutaneous layers to correctly estimate the skin Young's modulus. Moreover, the results illustrate that the variation of the measured Young's modulus at low penetration depth cannot be correctly described with usual one-layer mechanical models. Thus a two-layer elastic model was proposed, which highly improved the measurement of the skin mechanical properties.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Bone tissue mechanical properties are deemed a key component of bone strength, but their assessment requires invasive procedures. Here we validate a new instrument, a reference point indentation (RPI) instrument, for measuring these tissue properties in vivo. The RPI instrument performs bone microin
## Abstract Human patellar tendon stress (Ο), strain (Ξ΅), stiffness (__K__), and tensile or Young's modulus (__E__), are determined in vivo through voluntary isometric contractions monitored with Bβmode ultrasonography. The limitations in previous studies are: (1) they have generally not accounted
## Abstract The address for the corresponding author, Gladys N.L. OnambΓ©lΓ©, should read: Department of Exercise & Sport Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Hassall Road, Alsager ST7 2HL, United Kingdom. The article to which this Erratum refers was published in this issue on pages 1635β16