✦ LIBER ✦

In response to the reply by Roach et al.

✍ Scribed by Howard M. Sandler; Ronald W. McCallum

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1995
Tongue: English
Weight: 332 KB
Volume: 31
Category: Article
ISSN: 0360-3016
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)90373-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

In reply to the letter by Gevaert et al.

✍ Jozien Helleman; Maurice P.H.M. Jansen; Maria E.L. van der Burg; Els M.J.J. Bern 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 40 KB

raised an important issue about the implementation in clinical practice of the 9-gene set for platinum resistance of ovarian cancer patients. They also stated that nonplatinum containing regimens are suboptimal in the treatment of ovarian cancer. In our study 1 we have included specimens of 96 prim

Reply to the letter by MacLeod et al.

✍ Hisashi Kubota; Takafumi Nishizaki; Kohsuke Sasaki 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 28 KB

We are grateful to Dr. MacLeod and his colleagues for raising this important suggestion. As they commented, in several cases it is not possible to rule out accidental inclusion of syngeneic subclones in the analysis due to cell line cross-contamination. Therefore, such cell line cross-contamination

Reply to comment by Wallington et al.

✍ E. Ljungström; M. Hallquist 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB 👁 1 views

Reply to letter by winrow et al

✍ John S. Sullivan; Andrew F. Geczy; John K. Prendergast 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 242 KB

Reply to letter by winrow et al

✍ A. Toubert; B. Amor 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 130 KB 👁 1 views

Reply to comment by piazza et al.

✍ J.F. Julião 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 47 KB