Improved uranyl acetate staining for electron microscopy
โ Scribed by Tandler, Bernard
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 154 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0581
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Reserve Uni versi t y , C1 eve1 and , Ohio 44106 Uranyl acetate was one o f the f i r s t contrasting agents t o be used t o s t a i n t h i n sections f o r electron microscopy (Watson, 1958). Because t h i s compound i s only sparingly soluble i n water, absolute methanol, i n which very high concentrations o f uranyl acetate can be achieved, has been advocated as a solvent (Stempak and Ward, 1964) ( . Unfortunately, both aqueous and methanolic solutions o f uranyl acetate are inherently unstable, becoming t u r b i d and unusable s h o r t l y a f t e r preparation.
I n order t o f o r e s t a l l t h i s photoactive reaction o f uranyl acetate solutions, many workers store such solutions i n brown b o t t l e s o r wrap clear f l a s k s i n aluminum f o i l t o keep out l i g h t , but, even w i t h these precautions, the s t a i n i n g solutions s t i l l may p r e c i p i t a t e .
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Conventional fixation for thin-section electron microscopy is insufficient to preserve bacterial capsular material, a highly hydrated structure which collapses during dehydration and embedding. Boyles et al. (1984Boyles et al. ( , 1985) ) have recently introduced a modified aldehyde fixation process
Recently, we reported a new method combining freeze fixation followed by lyophilization and embedding in Lowicryl K4M (6). In the present brief report we compare the immunoreactivity of this preparation to chemically fixed and solvent dehydrated tissue traditionally used for electron microscopy (EM