𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Immune surveillance and neoplasia—1 a minimal mathematical model

✍ Scribed by Charles DeLisi; Aldo Rescigno


Book ID
104272196
Publisher
Springer
Year
1977
Tongue
English
Weight
972 KB
Volume
39
Category
Article
ISSN
1522-9602

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A deterministic predator-prey model is presented for describing the dynamics of a solid tumor in the presence of a specifically reactive lymphocyte population which is stimulated by, and antagonistic to, the tumor. The qualitative behavior of the solutions is developed and briefly compared to the results of transplantation experiments. Although the model is primitive, it leads to predictions that are in general agreement with observation and intuitive expectations. In particular, it is found that: (1) very low levels of transplanted tumor will not survive in the recipient. (2) At somewhat higher levels, tumor growth will be uncontrolled in the syngeneie recipient. However, immune intervention if early enough, can lead to control and elimination of the tumor. (3) At still higher levels of transplanted tumor, no amount of immune intervention will be effective in controlling the tumor. ( 4) If the recipients immune system is suppressed prior to transplantation, or is debilitated for any reason, the chance that the tumor will grow increases. ( 5) If the recipients immune system is stimulated prier to transplantation, the chance of tumor survival decreases. (6) The survival of the tumor is much more sensitive to changes in tumor parameters (for example, antigenicity) than in lymphocyte parameters. In addition it makes the unintuitive prediction that (7) There are isolated instances under which an increase in the number of lymphocytes can increase the chance of tumor survival.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Immune surveillance and neoplasia—II a t
✍ Aldo Rescigno; Charles DeLisi 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 641 KB

In a previous paper (DeLisi and Rescigno, 1977) a model for the interaction of tumor cells and killer lymphocytes was presented. Although that model was highly simplified, the qualitative behavior was in accord with intuitive expectations and a wide range of data, It could not however account for de