How sensitive are the commercial assays for anti- HTLV III/LAV?
β Scribed by L. J. Oldham; H. J. Moulsdale; P. P. Mortimer; R. S. Tedder; P. Morgan-Capner
- Book ID
- 102376928
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 250 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0146-6615
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The sensitivity of nine commercial assays, Western blot, and a newly developed monoclonal antibody-based assay for antibody to human T lymphotropic virus type III/lymphoadenopathy associated virus (anti-HTLV III/LAV) were evaluated using a panel of mainly weak-positive sera. In tests on 20 sera three commercial assays and a monoclonal-based assay, representing two different solid-phase methodologies, were found to be more sensitive than Western blot. Our findings suggest that Western blot cannot be depended upon as the sole confirmatory test for anti-HTLV IIULAV. The continued use of the more sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), particularly those of dissimilar methodology, would be a more valid approach to confirmatory testing.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
An immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody capture assay (GACRIA) methodologically distinct from other assays for the detection of antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus (anti-HTLV III/LAV) was developed and used to test 1,055 serum samples previously screened by