Historical Evidence and Argument
β Scribed by David Henige
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 340
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Historians know about the past because they examine the evidence. But what exactly is Βevidence,β how do historians know what it meansΒand how can we trust them to get it right? Historian David Henige tackles such questions of historical reliability head-on in his skeptical, unsparing, and acerbically witty Historical Evidence and Argument. ΒSystematic doubtβ is his watchword, and he practices what he preaches through a variety of insightful assessments of historical controversiesΒfor example, over the dating of artifacts and the textual analysis of translated documents. Skepticism, Henige contends, forces us to recognize the limits of our knowledge, but is also a positive force that stimulates new scholarship to counter it.
β¦ Table of Contents
CONTENTS......Page 10
Acknowledgments......Page 12
Declaiming the Endtime......Page 16
Traveling Hopefully......Page 20
The Anxieties of Ambiguity......Page 30
Unraveling Gordian Knots......Page 44
When Too Much Is Not Enough......Page 57
The Many Births of Frank Lloyd Wright......Page 73
Destroying in Order to Save......Page 80
Speaking of History......Page 92
Sensing Incongruity......Page 106
Poisoned Chalices......Page 117
Scotching the Myth-Making Machine......Page 132
Irreconcilable Differences......Page 140
βWeβre Changing Everything . . . Againβ......Page 149
Rule Life vs. Real Life......Page 163
When Might Makes Wrong......Page 176
Six Hundred Barrels of Plaster of Paris......Page 188
Millions of Moving Parts......Page 201
He Says, She Says......Page 215
Bringing Texts Up to Code......Page 226
Gaining and Providing Access......Page 238
Hearing a White Horse Coming......Page 251
Notes......Page 260
Bibliography......Page 294
Index......Page 332
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A leading expert in informal logic, Douglas Walton turns his attention in this new book to how reasoning operates in trials and other legal contexts, with special emphasis on the law of evidence. The new model he develops, drawing on methods of argumentation theory that are gaining wide acceptance i
<p><p>βThis monograph poses a series of key problems of evidential reasoning and argumentation. It then offers solutions achieved by applying recently developed computational models of argumentation made available in artificial intelligence. Each problem is posed in such a way that the solution is e
This volume presents a systematic review of interprofessional education in health and social care. This is accompanied by a wider-ranging critique of interprofessional education, grounded by experience, and informed by sources beyond the evaluations that qualified for inclusion in the review. Synthe