Argument Evaluation and Evidence
β Scribed by Douglas Walton (auth.)
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Year
- 2016
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 297
- Series
- Law, Governance and Technology Series 23
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
βThis monograph poses a series of key problems of evidential reasoning and argumentation. It then offers solutions achieved by applying recently developed computational models of argumentation made available in artificial intelligence. Each problem is posed in such a way that the solution is easily understood. The book progresses from confronting these problems and offering solutions to them, building a useful general method for evaluating arguments along the way. It provides a hands-on survey explaining to the reader how to use current argumentation methods and concepts that are increasingly being implemented in more precise ways for the application of software tools in computational argumentation systems. It shows how the use of these tools and methods requires a new approach to the concepts of knowledge and explanation suitable for diverse settings, such as issues of public safety and health, debate, legal argumentation, forensic evidence, science education, and the use of expert opinion evidence in personal and public deliberations.
β¦ Table of Contents
Front Matter....Pages i-xi
Introduction to Argument and Explanation....Pages 1-33
Inference to the Best Explanation....Pages 35-68
A Dialogue System for Evaluating Explanations....Pages 69-116
Evaluating Expert Opinion Evidence....Pages 117-144
Attribution of a Portrait to Leonardo da Vinci....Pages 145-178
Arguments from Correlation to Causation....Pages 179-208
Knowledge and Inquiry....Pages 209-242
Evidence and Argument Evaluation....Pages 243-278
Back Matter....Pages 279-286
β¦ Subjects
Philosophy of Law; International IT and Media Law, Intellectual Property Law; Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics); Semantics; Educational Philosophy
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Historians know about the past because they examine the evidence. But what exactly is Βevidence,β how do historians know what it meansΒand how can we trust them to get it right? Historian David Henige tackles such questions of historical reliability head-on in his skeptical, unsparing, and acerbical
A leading expert in informal logic, Douglas Walton turns his attention in this new book to how reasoning operates in trials and other legal contexts, with special emphasis on the law of evidence. The new model he develops, drawing on methods of argumentation theory that are gaining wide acceptance i
<P>This book concentrates on argumentation as it emerges in ordinary discourse, whether the discourse is institutionalized or strictly informal. Crucial concepts from the theory of argumentation are systematically discussed and explained with the help of examples from real-life discourse and texts.
<P>This book concentrates on argumentation as it emerges in ordinary discourse, whether the discourse is institutionalized or strictly informal. Crucial concepts from the theory of argumentation are systematically discussed and explained with the help of examples from real-life discourse and texts.