✦ LIBER ✦

Hepatic hemangiomas: Difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium

✍ Scribed by Rajan T. Gupta; Daniele Marin; Daniel T. Boll; Daniela B. Husarik; Drew E. Davis; Sebastian Feuerlein; Elmar M. Merkle

Book ID: 119234882
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2012
Tongue: English
Weight: 647 KB
Volume: 81
Category: Article
ISSN: 0720-048X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.10.014

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Enhancement effects of hepatic dynamic M

Enhancement effects of hepatic dynamic MR imaging at 3.0 T and 1.5 T using gadoxetic acid in a phantom study: comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine

✍ Kosuke Morita; Tomohiro Namimoto; Kazuo Awai; Masanori Komi; Masahiro Hashida; T 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 495 KB

## Abstract To identify the optimum sequence at gadoxetic acid enhanced hepatic dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the arterial phase, we studied phantoms that contained gadoxetic acid or gadopentetate dimeglumine diluted in human blood. We obtained magnetic resonance images at 3.0 T and 1.5 T w

Erratum to: Morita, et al., Enhancement

Erratum to: Morita, et al., Enhancement effects of hepatic dynamic MR imaging at 3.0 T and 1.5 T using gadoxetic acid in a phantom study: Comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine

📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 225 KB

The Fig. 3 was incorrect. It was same as the FIG. 2. The error had been made during the last stages of submitting publication-quality figures. The reviewers had seen the correct figure. The correct figure and legend is reprinted below. FIG. 3. Plots of the contrast ratio of the Gd concentrations at