๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Hedging corporate debt with U.S. treasury bond futures

โœ Scribed by Robert C. Kuberek; Norman G. Pefley


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1983
Tongue
English
Weight
560 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


ecent articles on the hedging effectiyeness of interest-rate futures have fo-R cused on the relationship betpbeen futures contracts and their underlying cash instruments. Ederington (1979) examines the use of Treasury bill and GNMA futures to hedge the price risk in holding Treasury bills and GNMA certificates, respectively; Cicchetti, Dale, and Vignola (1981) provide an alternative test of the performance of Treasury bill futures in hedging Treasury bills; and Maness (1981) investigates buy-hedge strategies using Treasury bill futures to hedge anticipated Treasury bill purchases.

However, because changes in the market values of a wide variety of debt instruments are dominated by changes in a common term structure, the hedging potential of particular interest rate futures is not limited to the respective underIying instruments. The present study outlines a procedure for evaluating the cross-hedging effectiveness of interest-rate futures and applies the procedure to the use of Treasury bond futures to hedge the price risk of corporate debt. Our research suggests the following:

(1) Treasury bond futures offer substantial protection from unexpected changes

(2) Treasury bond futures are more effective in hedging higher-quality corpo-

(3) nearer Treasury bond futures contracts are superior to more distant con-Section I briefly motivates the study. In Section I1 we define the optimal hedge and derive the optimal hedge ratio. In Section-111 we postulate a probability model, permitting estimation of the optimal hedge ratio. Section IV outlines the estimation procedure and Section V presents our results. Finally, Section VI offers a brief summary. in corporate bond prices; rate debt than lower-quality corporate debt; and tracts in hedging corporate debt.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Hedging canadian corporate debt: A compa
โœ Louis Gagnon; Samuel Mensah; Edward H. Blinder ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 636 KB

T ber 1980 to provide Canadian market players with the ability to hedge their positions against interest rate fluctuations. Instruments for both ends of the term structure were introduced: a 9 1 -Day Government of Canada Treasury Bill Futures contract for the short end and, for the long end, a Long

Hedging mortgage-backed securities with
โœ Carl A. Batlin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 985 KB

Carl A. Bath\*''' everal developments in the early 1980s brought the general problem of S hedging mortgage-backed securities (MBS) to prominence. Investor demand for these instruments was boosted sharply by legislation designed to improve liquidity in the thrift industry. The new regulations permit

Cross hedging CDs with treasury bill fut
โœ Andrew J. Senchack Jr.; John C. Easterwood ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1983 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 641 KB

T managers to seek out new and more sophisticated financial planning tools to cope with their more complex financial problems. This awakening need for a more effective risk-trader mechanism to protect against the growing uncertainty and volatility of interest rates directly led to the development of

Corporate taxes and hedging with futures
โœ T. Hanan Eytan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 382 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Hedging money market CDs with treasury-b
โœ Jack W. Parker; Robert T. Daigler ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 585 KB

A other financial institutions. The introduction of money market certificates of deposit (MMCDs) provided a vehicle where small investors may purchase CDs with a relatively small cash investment. Unusually high interest rates during the recent past convinced many of these investors to switch funds f

Conversion factor risk and hedging in th
โœ Alex Kane; Alan J. Marcus ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 623 KB

he underlying asset on a Treasury-bond futures contract in the Chicago T Board of Trade (CBT) is not a real asset, but is rather a hypothetical 15-yearmaturity government bond bearing an 8% coupon. Because the contract is settled using actual government bonds, the CBT is required to establish conver