T managers to seek out new and more sophisticated financial planning tools to cope with their more complex financial problems. This awakening need for a more effective risk-trader mechanism to protect against the growing uncertainty and volatility of interest rates directly led to the development of
Hedging money market CDs with treasury-bill futures
β Scribed by Jack W. Parker; Robert T. Daigler
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1981
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 585 KB
- Volume
- 1
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
A other financial institutions. The introduction of money market certificates of deposit (MMCDs) provided a vehicle where small investors may purchase CDs with a relatively small cash investment. Unusually high interest rates during the recent past convinced many of these investors to switch funds from low-interest savings accounts to high-interest MMCDs. Moreover, the volatility of interest rates has increased substantially during the past several years. Consequently, when the bank's assets are primarily in fixed-rate long-term loans and fixed-rate long-term investment securities, the financial institution has a locked-in interest rate for the long-term assets, but is subject to changing short-term interest rates as the MMCDs roll over each six months at the current short-term rate. When the short-term rate rises above the long-term loan rate, the bank income statement undergoes substantial strain.
To overcome the problem described above, one may lock in the short-term interest rate when rates are anticipated to rise by employing a hedge via the Treasury-bill futures market. This article discusses how a financial institution may employ T-bill futures to hedge asset-liability "gaps" caused by MMCDs, including the procedure to implement such a hedge program, an example, and data requirements to satisfy information needs for the bank's board of directors and the regulatory agencies.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
n a recent article, examined the hedging performance I of financial futures markets using a portfolio model derived from the hedging theories of . His article concluded that GNMA futures were more effective than T-Bill futures in reducing price change risk. Moreover, in the short term, the performa
his article discusses the "hedging usefulness'' of the 90-day Treasury-T bill futures contract traded on the IMM. The articlk improves upon the methodology used previously by Ederington. The improvement is that the authors (referred to hereafter as CDV) use an actual bill-the 6-month T-bill delivera
The purpose of that article was to present a model in which "when testing the effectiveness of hedging Treasury bills, one must take into account the term to maturity on the deliverable bill and adjust for the constant yield price accumulation." The Dale et al. analysis is misleading because it foc
ersistent discrepancies between implied forward rates on the yield curve P and corresponding futures rates have been widely observed. For instance, in one of our samples, eight week-ahead forward-future spreads averaged nearly 70 discount basis points before 1982 and have since averaged about 30 bas