Ghost fishing in European waters: Impacts and management responses
β Scribed by James Brown; Graeme Macfadyen
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 256 KB
- Volume
- 31
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0308-597X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In this paper we review levels of net loss, what happens to the gear once it has been lost, and the resulting levels of 'ghost catches' made in passive net fisheries in the EU. We also consider ghost catches resulting from lost gear in other types of fisheries, and the extent to which the value of ghost catches has been quantified. We consider why fishing gear is lost, and profile common management responses. We present a cost benefit model to assess the relative cost effectiveness of different management measures, and suggest that gear retrieval programmes may provide less value for money than other management responses.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Common killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus, are found in marshes and estuaries along the Atlantic coast of North America from Newfoundland to Florida. Although these habitats are highly productive, they are also characterized by variation in a number of abiotic stressors, including temperature, salinit
## Abstract There are no unanimous views regarding the real waterβsaving effects of land and water management innovations. Some claim that the innovations merely change the prevailing water allocation. However, there is no dispute regarding their land and water productivity impacts. The water produ