## Abstract The genetic alterations that underlie prostate tumorigenesis are assumed to comprise gain or loss of specific chromosomal regions, whole chromosomes, or sequence‐specific mutations. Existing data have not demonstrated clear specificity of whole chromosome or regional chromosomal gain or
Genetic aberrations in prostate cancer by microarray analysis
✍ Scribed by Outi R. Saramäki; Kati P. Porkka; Robert L. Vessella; Tapio Visakorpi
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 600 KB
- Volume
- 119
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The aim of this study was to screen genetic as well as expression alterations in prostate cancer. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to a 16K cDNA microarray was performed to analyze DNA sequence copy number alterations in 5 prostate cancer cell lines and 13 xenografts. The aCGH confirmed the previously implicated common gains and losses, such as gains at 1q, 7, 8q, 16p and 17q and losses at 2q, 4p/q, 6q, 8p, 13q, 16q, 17p and 18q, which have previously been identified by chromosomal CGH (cCGH). Because of the higher resolution of aCGH, the minimal commonly altered regions were significantly narrowed‐down. For example, the gain of 8q was mapped to three independent regions, 8q13.3‐q21.11, 8q22.2 and 8q24.13‐q24.3. In addition, a novel recurrent gain at 9p13‐q21 was identified. The concomitant expression analysis indicated that genome‐wide DNA sequence copy number (gene dosage) was significantly associated with the expression level (p < 0.0001). The analyses indicated several individual genes whose expression was associated with the gene copy number. For example, gains of PTK2 and FZD6, were associated with the increased expression, whereas losses of TNFRSF10B (alias DR5) and ITGA4 with decreased expression. In conclusion, the aCGH mapping data will aid in the identification of genes altered in prostate cancer. The combined expression and copy number analysis suggested that even a low‐level copy number change may have significant effect on gene expression, and thus on the development of prostate cancer. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: Germline mutations in recessive cancer predisposition genes are uncovered by somatic genetic deletions during tumor development. analysis of genetic changes in tumor tissues from patients with an inherited predisposition may therefore highlight regions of the genome containing suscep
The multistep nature of carcinogenesis has been repeatedly demonstrated for a variety of human cancers. Concomitant mutational activation of genes that promote cellular growth (i.e., oncogenes) and inactivation of genes that normally act to restrict or otherwise regulate growth (i.e., tumor suppress
## Abstract ## Purpose To explore the potential of computerized characterization of prostate MR images by extracting the fractal features of texture and intensity distributions as indices in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer. ## Materials and Methods MR T2‐weighted images (T2WI) of 5
Four low-grade oligodendrogliomas, nine anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and two mixed oligoastrocytomas were investigated for chromosomal aberrations by comparative genomic hybridization on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. The most frequent losses observed involved 1p, 9p, 10pq, 14q,
Molecular biologic studies have now identified a number of important genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that cause alterations in growth and differentiation genes in prostate cancer. In addition to DNA deletion and point mutation, DNA methylation represents a new paradigm for the inactivation of tumo