๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Gene expression profiling of esophageal cancer: Comparative analysis of Barrett's esophagus, adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma

โœ Scribed by Danielle M. Greenawalt; Cuong Duong; Gordon K. Smyth; Marianne L. Ciavarella; Natalie J. Thompson; Thomas Tiang; William K. Murray; Robert J.S. Thomas; Wayne A. Phillips


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
French
Weight
846 KB
Volume
120
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Esophageal cancer is a particularly aggressive tumor with poor prognosis, however, our current knowledge of the genes and pathways involved in tumorigenesis of the esophagus are limited. To obtain insight into the molecular processes underlying tumorigenesis of the esophagus, we have used cDNA microarrays to compare the gene expression profiles of 128 tissue samples representing the major histological subtypes of esophageal cancer (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (ADC)) as well as Barrett's esophagus (BE), the precursor lesion to ADC, and normal esophageal epithelium. Linear discriminant analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering show the separation of samples into 4 distinct groups consistent with their histological subtype. Differentially expressed genes were identified between each of the tissue types. Comparison of gene ontologies and gene expression profiles identified gene profiles specific to esophageal cancer, as well as BE. โ€œEsophageal cancer clusters,โ€ representing proliferation, immune response, and extracellular matrix genes were identified, as well as digestion, hydrolase, and transcription factor clusters specific to the columnar phenotype observed during BE and esophageal ADC. These clusters provide valuable insight into the molecular and functional differences between normal esophageal epithelium, BE, and the 2 histologically distinct forms of esophageal cancers. Our thorough, unbiased analysis provides a rich source of data for further studies into the molecular basis of tumorigenesis of the esophagus, as well as identification of potential biomarkers for early detection of progression. ยฉ 2007 Wileyโ€Liss, Inc.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


MAGE, BAGE, and GAGE gene expression in
โœ Annalisa Zambon; Susanna Mandruzzato; Anna Parenti; Beatrice Macino; Piero Daler ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 156 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The MAGE, BAGE, and GAGE gene families code for distinct, tumor specific antigens that are recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the context of HLA molecules. The purpose of this study was to analyze MAGE, BAGE, and GAGE gene expression in the two major histologic types of esophageal carcinoma, s

Molecular characterization of adenocarci
โœ Angel Chao; Tzu-Hao Wang; Yun-Shien Lee; Swei Hsueh; An-Shine Chao; Ting-Chang C ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 316 KB

## Abstract In an attempt to understand the molecular mechanisms for the different clinical features between adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma (AC/ASC) and squamous carcinoma (SC) of the uterine cervix, we analyzed gene expression profiles of different histological subtypes of cervical cancer.

Comparative genomic hybridization of squ
โœ Takashi Shinomiya; Toshiki Mori; Yoji Ariyama; Tomoya Sakabe; Yoji Fukuda; Yasus ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 198 KB

We investigated copy number aberrations in 29 primary tumors and 12 cell lines of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESC) using comparative genomic hybridization. In the primary tumors, the most common sites of copy number gains were 3q26.3-27 (45%), 8q24 (41%), 5p15 (38%), Xq27-28 (38%), 14q32 (31

XRCC1 gene polymorphisms and esophageal
โœ Liping Dai; Kaijuan Wang; Jianying Zhang; Quanjun Lv; Xiaobing Wu; Yanping Wang ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 385 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract Two nonโ€synonymous polymorphisms Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln in the DNAโ€base excision repair gene Xโ€ray repair crossโ€complementing group 1 (__XRCC1__) have been implicated in risk for esophageal cancer. However, the results from different studies remain controversial. The present metaโ€analy