Other social transaction costs may include brokerage commissions, transaction fees, etc. Unlike the bid-ask spread, these components typically do not depend directly on the trading mechanism/environment or on the security's return properties (e.g., volatility), although they may depend on the price
Futures trading, transaction costs, and stock market volatility
โ Scribed by B. Wade Brorsen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 689 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Introduction
he controversy created by "Black Monday" and the recent stock market crash Many of the proposals to deal with the perceived increased volatility' are actually proposals to increase market frictions by increasing transaction costs, increasing margins, limiting arbitrage, or banning trading in futures. This article argues that these proposals will indeed succeed in reducing short-run price volatility, but that they will have no effect on long-run volatility.
Much of the blame for increased volatility is placed on the futures market and its links with the cash market.' Cash market participants have a long history of objecting to futures markets. Past research provides little support for this opposition. An extensive review of the literature (Committee on Agriculture (1985, p. 204)) summarizes research on the effects of futures on cash markets: "the findings of these studies are fairly impressive in that they generally show that the introduction of new derivative markets either did not significantly affect the variability of cash market prices or reduced it."
It seems unlikely that so much opposition to futures markets is totally irrational as past research seems to suggest. This study extends the arguments of Brorsen, Oellermann, and Farris (1989) that futures markets cause cash markets to adjust more sharply which, in turn, increases price variability in the short-run. This increase in short-run price variability may explain the opposition to futures markets. Short-run volatility appears to be a major concern for stock market regulators and participants. The proposed "circuit-breakers'' are specifically designed to reduce volatility in the short run.
T has led to much interest in developing regulations to reduce price volatility. The author is grateful to Franklin Edwards and Scott Irwin for their helpful comments. 'Whether volatility has increased or not is still a subject of some controversy. Edwards (1988) ar-'See Report ofthe Presidentiul Tusk Force on Market Mechanisms (1988) for an example.
gues it has not, while Harris (1989) found only a small increase.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In this study we examine how volatility and the futures risk premium affect trading demands for hedging and speculation in the S&P 500 Stock Index futures contracts. To ascertain if different volatility measures matter in affecting the result, we employ three volatility estimates. Our e
This article has benefited from the comments and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers. ## 1 Of course, speculation based on fundamentals is likely to be stabilizing rather than destabilizing. Destabilizing speculation may be the result of noise trading (i.e., buying and selling not on the basis