๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Future economy of electric power generated by nuclear and coal-fired power plants

โœ Scribed by Mynor King; Charles C.T. Yang

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
915 KB
Volume
6
Category
Article
ISSN
1751-4223

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Future carbon regulations and current in
Future carbon regulations and current investments in alternative coal-fired power plant technologies
โœ Ram C. Sekar; John E. Parsons; Howard J. Herzog; Henry D. Jacoby ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 185 KB

We analyze how uncertain future US carbon regulations shape the current choice of the type of power plant to build. Our focus is on two coal-fired technologies, pulverized coal (PC) and integrated coal gasification combined cycle technology (IGCC). The PC technology is cheapest-assuming there is no

Controlling acid deposition by seasonal
Controlling acid deposition by seasonal gas substitution in coal- and oil-fired power plants
โœ Galeucia, Gary ;Golomb, Dan ;Fay, James A. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› American Institute of Chemical Engineers ๐ŸŒ English โš– 861 KB

Based on evidence that the rate of wet sulfate deposition in eastern North America is higher in the summer half of the year than in the winter haw, seasonal control of emissions is proposed as a means of minimizing acid deposition control costs. This paper evaluates the proposal that natural gas be

De-regulated electric power markets and
De-regulated electric power markets and operating nuclear power plants: the case of British energy
โœ James G. Hewlett ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 169 KB

One issue addressed in almost all electric power restructuring/de-regulation plans in both the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) was the recovery of operating nuclear power plant's spent fuel disposal costs and the expenditures to decommission the units when they are retired. Prior to r