Functional effects of genetic polymorphisms in the N-acetyltransferase 1 coding and 3′ untranslated regions
✍ Scribed by Yuanqi Zhu; J. Christopher States; Yang Wang; David W. Hein
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 423 KB
- Volume
- 91
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1542-0752
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The functional effects of N-acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1) polymorphisms and haplotypes are poorly understood, compromising the validity of associations reported with diseases, including birth defects and numerous cancers. METHODS: We investigated the effects of genetic polymorphisms within the NAT1 coding region and the 3 0 -untranslated region (3 0 -UTR) and their associated haplotypes on N-and O-acetyltransferase catalytic activities, and NAT1 mRNA and protein levels following recombinant expression in COS-1 cells. RESULTS: 1088T>A (rs1057126; 3 0 -UTR) and 1095C>A (rs15561; 3 0 -UTR) each slightly reduced NAT1 catalytic activity and NAT1 mRNA and protein levels. A 9-bp (TAATAATAA) deletion between nucleotides 1065 and 1090 (3 0 -UTR) reduced NAT1 catalytic activity and NAT1 mRNA and protein levels. In contrast, a 445G>A (rs4987076; V149I), 459G>A (rs4986990; T153T), and 640T>G (rs4986783; S214A) coding region haplotype present in NAT1*11 increased NAT1 catalytic activity and NAT1 protein, but not NAT1 mRNA levels. A combination of the 9-bp (TAATAATAA) deletion and the 445G>A, 459G>A, and 640T>G coding region haplotypes, both present in NAT1*11, appeared to neutralize the opposing effects on NAT1 protein and catalytic activity, resulting in levels of NAT1 protein and catalytic activity that did not differ significantly from the NAT1*4 reference. CONCLUSIONS: Because 1095C>A (3 0 -UTR) is the sole polymorphism present in NAT1*3, our data suggest that NAT1*3 is not functionally equivalent to the NAT1*4 reference. Furthermore, our findings provide biologic support for reported associations of 1088T>A and 1095C>A polymorphisms with birth defects. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 91: 77-84, 2011.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES