Language acquisition is a developmental process. Research on spontaneous processes of both children learning their mother tongue and adults learning a second language has shown that particular stages of acquisition can be discriminated. Initially, learner utterances can be accounted for in terms of
Functional Categories in Learner Language
โ Scribed by Christine Dimroth (editor); Peter Jordens (editor)
- Publisher
- De Gruyter Mouton
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 360
- Series
- Studies on Language Acquisition [SOLA]; 37
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Language acquisition is a developmental process. Research on spontaneous processes of both children learning their mother tongue and adults learning a second language has shown that particular stages of acquisition can be discriminated. Initially, learner utterances can be accounted for in terms of a language system that is relatively simple. In studies on second language acquisition this learner system is called the Basic Variety (Klein and Perdue 1997). Utterance structure of the Basic Variety is determined by a grammar which consists of lexical structures that are constrained, for example, by semantic principles such as "The NP-referent with highest control comes first" and a pragmatic principle such as "Focus expression last". At some point in acquisition this lexical-semantic system is given up in favour of a target-like system with morpho-syntactic features to express the functional properties of finiteness, topicality, the determiner system, etc. Insights into how this process evolves may also provide an answer to the question of why it takes place. Within this functional perspective on language acquisition research focuses on questions such as the following.
1. What is the driving force behind the process that causes learners to give up a simple lexical-semantic system in favour of a morpho-syntactic functional category system?
2. What is the added value of morpho-syntactic properties of inflection, word-order variation, definiteness and agreement?
3. Why is it that in cases of specific language impairment it is mainly morpho-syntactic properties of the target language that are affected?
โฆ Table of Contents
Frontmatter
Contents
Convergence on finite V2 clauses in L1, bilingual L1 and early L2 acquisition
The acquisition of functional categories in child L1 and adult L2 Dutch
The acquisition of syntactic finiteness in L1 German. A structure-building approach.
Stepping stones and stumbling blocks. Why negation accelerates and additive particles delay the acquisition of finiteness in German
Does finiteness mark assertion? A picture selection study with native speakers and adult learners of German
Light verbs and the acquisition of finiteness and negation in Dutch as a second language
Finiteness in children with SLI โ a functional approach
Functional and modal elements in child and adult Russian
How much (morpho-)syntax is needed to express finiteness?
Relating Italian articles and clitic object pronouns in bilingual children acquiring Italian and German
Backmatter
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>Research on spontaneous language acquisition both in children learning their mother tongue and in adults learning a second language has shown that language development proceeds in a stagewise manner. Learner utterances are accounted for in terms of so-called 'learner languages'. Learner languages
<p>This study investigates the acquisition of Functional Categories from the perspective of self-organization. Syntax emerges through a major bifurcation of the dynamical language system. Dynamical notions such as precursor, oscillation, symmetry-breaking, and trigger are explanatory tools for the d
In every language there are descriptive lexical elements, such as evening and whisper, as well as grammatical elements, such as the and -ing. The distinction between these two elements has proven useful in a number of domains, but what is covered by the terms, lexical and grammatical, and the basis
In every language there are descriptive lexical elements, such as evening and whisper, as well as grammatical elements, such as the and -ing. The distinction between these two elements has proven useful in a number of domains, but what is covered by the terms, lexical and grammatical, and the basis