𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Four-Element Cylindrical Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Wideband Monopole-Like Radiation

✍ Scribed by Guha, D.; Antar, Y.M.M.


Book ID
120425704
Publisher
IEEE
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
857 KB
Volume
54
Category
Article
ISSN
0018-926X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Aperture-coupled cylindrical dielectric
✍ George Drossos; Zhipeng Wu; Lionel E. Davis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 114 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Two four-element linear aperture-coupled cylindrical dielectric resonator antenna arrays ha¨e been theoretically modeled and experimentally implemented. The arrays produced broadside radiation shaping the E-and H-plane, respecti¨ely. The resonant frequency, return loss, radiation pattern, gain, unlo

Four-element planar arrays employing pro
✍ George Drossos; Zhipeng Wu; Lionel E. Davis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 200 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Three four-element planar arrays, with the radiating elements being cylindrical dielectric resonator antennas excited by probes at the HE mode, are reported. The first array produces broadside radia-11␦ tion, whereas the other two pro¨ide maximum radiation at ele¨ation angles of ; 35᎐40Њ. The resona

Implementation of four-element linear ar
✍ George Drossos; Zhipeng Wu; Lionel E. Davis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 248 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Figure 7 Attenuation in slow-wave structure w x This higher loss is due to the conductor loss 9 . The conductor loss for the slow wave can be incorporated in this formuw x lation 10 . ## 4. CONCLUSION Using the concept of SLR formulation, a unified CADoriented model for the multilayer slow-wave mi

Coaxial-fed monopole antenna coupled by
✍ Sheng-Ming Deng; Ching-Long Tsai; Sheng-Far Chang; Sheau-Shong Bor πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 154 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

For the propagating mode, the field is evanescent outside the dielectric. We expect the field to be very small when it reaches the PEC boundary. The difference in higher frequency is because the mesh in SOM is not as dense as that in finite-difference method. ## 4. CONCLUSION In this paper, the wa