𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Finite-time behaviour of solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger evolution equations

✍ Scribed by Jian Zhang

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
336 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0362-546X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Regularity in Time of Solutions to Nonli
Regularity in Time of Solutions to Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations
✍ N. Hayashi; K. Kato 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 655 KB

In this paper we consider the regularity of solutions to nomlinear Schrödinger equations (NLS), \[ \begin{aligned} i \hat{C}, u+\frac{1}{3} \| u & =F(u, u) . & & (t, x) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{B}^{\prime \prime}, \\ u(0) & =\phi . & & x \in \mathbb{R}^{u} . \end{aligned} \] where \(F\) is a po

Analytic Solutions to Nonelliptic Nonlin
Analytic Solutions to Nonelliptic Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations
✍ A. Debouard 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 495 KB

We prove local existence of analytic solutions for nonlinear Schrödinger-type equations. The class we consider includes a number of equations derived from the physical context of water waves. 1993 Academic Press, Inc.

Efficient Finite Difference Solutions to
Efficient Finite Difference Solutions to the Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation
✍ Patrick L. Nash; L.Y. Chen 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 244 KB

explicit and local. Its novel features include the exact evaluation of a major contribution to an approximation to the The matrix elements of the exponential of a finite difference realization of the one-dimensional Laplacian are found exactly. This evolution operator (Eq. ( )) and a first-order ap

Erratum: Stabilization of solutions to n
Erratum: Stabilization of solutions to nonlinear Schrödinger equations
✍ Scipio Cuccagna 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 25 KB 👁 1 views

The proof of lemma 5.2 in [1] contains several mistakes. Nevertheless, the statement is correct and is proven in an elementary fashion, correctly this time, in [3, lemma 2.4], which is in this issue of the journal. In the proof of corollary 3.2 in [1], we misquoted from Kato's textbook on perturbat