𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Familial resemblance in fatness and fat distribution

✍ Scribed by Peter T. Katzmarzyk; Robert M. Malina; Louis Pérusse; Treva Rice; Michael A. Province; D.C. Rao; Claude Bouchard


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
104 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
1042-0533

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The purpose of the study was to estimate the degree of familial resemblance in anthropometric indicators of fatness and fat distribution. The sample consisted of 327 Caucasian participants from 102 nuclear families. Indicators of fatness included the body mass index (BMI), the sum of six skinfolds (SF6: triceps + biceps + medial calf + subscapular + suprailiac + abdominal), and waist circumference (WAIST), while indicators of fat distribution included WAIST adjusted for BMI (WAIST ADJ ), the trunk-toextremity skinfold ratio, adjusted for SF6 (TER ADJ ), and the first principal component of skinfolds, adjusted for the mean skinfold of the individual (PC1). A general familial correlation model was fit to the data, and a series of nested reduced models were also fit so as to test hypotheses about familial resemblance. The hypothesis of no familial resemblance (all familial correlations are zero) was rejected for all phenotypes, indicating that fatness and fat distribution aggregate within families. For the three indicators of fatness (BMI, SF6, and WAIST), the sibling and parent-offspring correlations were significant. Further, there were no sex or generation differences in the familial correlations. For the three indicators of fat distribution (TER ADJ , WAIST ADJ , and PC1), there was no parent-offspring resemblance; sibling resemblance was significant for TER ADJ and PC1. Further, spouse resemblance was not significant for WAIST ADJ , but was for TER ADJ and PC1. For both WAIST ADJ and PC1 there were significant sex differences in the familial correlations. A combination of models including no sex or generation differences and no spouse resemblance was the most parsimonious model for BMI, SF6, and TER ADJ . The environmental model (all correlations equal) was the most parsimonious for WAIST, the model of no sibling resemblance was the most parsimonious for WAIST ADJ , and the model of no spousal resemblance was the most parsimonious for PC1. Estimates of maximal heritability range from 46-60% for fatness and from 29-48% for fat distribution, independent of overall fatness, suggesting that in this sample the heritability of fatness is greater than that for fat distribution. Further, the pattern of correlations, which generally includes no spousal resemblance but significant parent-Contract grant sponsors: Medical Research


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Menarche age, fatness, and fat distribut
✍ Brown, Daniel E.; Koenig, Tupou V.; Demorales, Alexis M.; McGuire, Ka'ohulani; M 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 65 KB 👁 2 views

Menarche age was assessed in 93 adolescent females in a sample of public schools in East Hawaii. Native Hawaiian girls had significantly lower reported age at menarche than non-Hawaiian classmates. Age at menarche was significantly correlated with total fatness as measured by the sum of six skinfold

Cross-trait familial resemblance for res
✍ Ping An; Treva Rice; Jacques Gagnon; Arthur S. Leon; James S. Skinner; Jack H. W 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 79 KB 👁 1 views

Cross-trait familial resemblance between resting blood pressure (BP) and body composition and fat distribution was examined in 98 Caucasian families participating in the HERITAGE Family Study by using a multivariate familial correlation model assessing both intraindividual and interindividual cross-

Fat distribution in Cuban infants
✍ María Elena Diaz; Minerva Montero; Iraida Wong; Vilma Moreno; Emilia Maria Toled 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 391 KB 👁 1 views