𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Familial concordance of breast cancer pathology as an indicator of genotype in multiple-case families

✍ Scribed by Rosemary L. Balleine; Pamela J. Provan; Gulietta M. Pupo; Nirmala Pathmanathan; Margaret Cummings; Gelareh Farshid; Elizabeth L. Salisbury; A. Michael Bilous; Karen Byth; Graham J. Mann


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
499 KB
Volume
49
Category
Article
ISSN
1045-2257

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The heterogeneity of multiple case breast cancer families that do not carry mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (non‐BRCA1/2 families) poses a challenge to the identification of breast cancer susceptibility genes. The aim of this study was to determine whether intrafamilial concordance in breast cancer pathology could identify subgroups of non‐BRCA1/2 families with consistent genotypic features. Invasive breast cancers were reviewed from 84 individuals belonging to 30 multiple‐case families; BRCA1 (n = 9), BRCA2 (n = 10), and non‐BRCA1/2 (n = 11). Hierarchical cluster analysis based on histopathology and age at first diagnosis was then used to specify three subgroups designated Clusters 1–3. The genomic features of non‐BRCA1/2 families were examined by genome wide linkage and FGFR2 SNP genotyping, according to whether they showed cluster‐concordant or cluster‐mixed familial pathology. The majority of pathogenic BRCA1 mutation carriers (80%) fell into a single cluster. In contrast pathogenic BRCA2 mutation carriers were distributed across all three clusters and within families, cluster groups were also generally mixed. Most non‐BRCA1/2 mutation carriers belonged to Cluster 3 (71%). Genome wide linkage data from five non‐BRCA1/2 Cluster 3‐concordant families were compared with four mixed cluster non‐BRCA1/2 families. This revealed a number of distinct linkage peaks, including some regions previously associated with breast cancer susceptibility. The distribution of low risk alleles in FGFR2 was not different between these two subgroups (P = 0.237). The pattern of breast cancer pathology concordance amongst family members may assist the investigation of breast cancer susceptibility in multiple case families. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


An important role for BRCA1 in breast ca
✍ Jacqueline Taylor; Margarita Lymboura; Paul E. Pace; Roger P. A'hern; Anil J. De 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 625 KB

The presence of BRCA1 protein was determined immunohistochemically in normal and benign breast biopsies, nonfamilial breast carcinomas and breast carcinomas from one or more individuals from 8 BRCA1 families. Strikingly, little staining was detected in breast carcinomas from BRCA1 families, regardle

Evaluation of SNPs in miR-146a, miR196a2
✍ Irene Catucci; Rongxi Yang; Paolo Verderio; Sara Pizzamiglio; Ludwig Heesen; Kar 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 102 KB

Recently, the SNPs rs11614913 in hsa-mir-196a2 and rs3746444 in hsa-mir-499 were reported to be associated with increased breast cancer risk, and the SNP rs2910164 in hsa-mir-146a was shown to have an effect on age of breast cancer diagnosis. In order to further investigate the effect of these SNPs,

Germline mutation and large deletion ana
✍ Tadeusz Dębniak; Bohdan Górski; Rodney J. Scott; Cezary Cybulski; Krzysztof Mędr 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 75 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract The __CDKN2A/ARF__ genes have been associated with increased risk of malignant melanoma (MM) in families with multiple members affected by disease and in families characterized by the constellation of breast cancer and MM. The exact contribution of __CDKN2A/ARF__ to disease risk remains