✦ LIBER ✦

Faculty evaluation: Reliability of peer assessments of research, teaching, and service

✍ Scribed by Lawrence S. Root

Publisher: Springer
Year: 1987
Tongue: English
Weight: 800 KB
Volume: 26
Category: Article
ISSN: 0361-0365
DOI: 10.1007/bf00991934

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Identifying faculty types using peer rat

Identifying faculty types using peer ratings of teaching, research, and service

✍ John Kremer 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 600 KB

Evaluating faculty performance: A practi

Evaluating faculty performance: A practical guide to assessing teaching, research, and service

✍ Ann E. Austin 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) ⚖ 83 KB 👁 2 views

Formative and summative evaluation in th

Formative and summative evaluation in the faculty peer review of teaching

✍ Ronald R. Cavanagh 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 343 KB

Relationships of research and teaching:

Relationships of research and teaching: Implications for faculty evaluation

✍ Lawrence R. Jauch 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 720 KB

Typical faculty concerns about student e

Typical faculty concerns about student evaluation of teaching

✍ Lawrence M. Aleamoni 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 426 KB

Citation ranking versus peer evaluation

Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship

✍ Meho, Lokman I. ;Sonnenwald, Diane H. 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 167 KB

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between citation ranking and peer evaluation in assessing senior faculty research performance. Other studies typically derive their peer evaluation data directly from referees, often in the form of ranking. This study uses two additional sourc