๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Exposure to high-field MRI does not affect cognitive function

โœ Scribed by Marc Schlamann; Melanie A. Voigt; Stefan Maderwald; Andreas K. Bitz; Oliver Kraff; Susanne C. Ladd; Mark E. Ladd; Michael Forsting; Hans Wilhelm


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
83 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose

To assess potential cognitive deficits under the influence of static magnetic fields at various field strengths some studies already exist. These studies were not focused on attention as the most vulnerable cognitive function. Additionally, mostly no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were performed.

Materials and Methods

In all, 25 rightโ€handed men were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent one MRI examination of 63 minutes at 1.5 T and one at 7 T within an interval of 10 to 30 days. The order of the examinations was randomized. Subjects were referred to six standardized neuropsychological tests strictly focused on attention immediately before and after each MRI examination. Differences in neuropsychological variables between the timepoints before and after each MRI examination were assessed and Pโ€values were calculated

Results

Only six subtests revealed significant differences between preโ€ and postโ€MRI. In these tests the subjects achieved better results in postโ€MRI testing than in preโ€MRI testing (P = 0.013โ€“0.032). The other tests revealed no significant results.

Conclusion

The improvement in postโ€MRI testing is only explicable as a result of learning effects. MRI examinations, even in ultrahighโ€field scanners, do not seem to have any persisting influence on the attention networks of human cognition immediately after exposure. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:1061โ€“1066. ยฉ 2010 Wileyโ€Liss, Inc.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Exposure to high static or pulsed magnet
โœ Veronique Anton-Leberre; Evert Haanappel; Nathalie Marsaud; Lidwine Trouilh; Lau ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 242 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract We report results of a study of the effects of strong static (up to 16โ€‰T for 8โ€‰h) and pulsed (up to 55โ€‰T singleโ€shot and 4โ€‰ร—โ€‰20โ€‰T repeated shots) magnetic fields on __Saccharomyces cerevisiae__ cultures in the exponential phase of growth. In contrast to previous reports restricted to on

Short-term exposure to mobile phone base
โœ Stacy Eltiti; Denise Wallace; Anna Ridgewell; Konstantina Zougkou; Riccardo Russ ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 88 KB

## Abstract Individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields often report cognitive impairments that they believe are due to exposure to mobile phone technology. Previous research in this area has revealed mixed results, however, with the majority of research only testing control indivi

Safety of human MRI at static fields abo
โœ Ian C. Atkinson; Laura Renteria; Holly Burd; Neil H. Pliskin; Keith R. Thulborn ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 259 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Purpose To assess whether exposure to a 9.4T static magnetic field during sodium imaging at 105.92 MHz affects human vital signs and cognitive function. ## Materials and Methods Measurements of human vital signs and cognitive ability made before and after exposure to a 9.4T MR sca