Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning
✍ Scribed by Marcelo A. Falappa; Gabriele Kern-Isberner; Guillermo R. Simari
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 215 KB
- Volume
- 141
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0004-3702
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
We present different constructions for nonprioritized belief revision, that is, belief changes in which the input sentences are not always accepted. First, we present the concept of explanation in a deductive way. Second, we define multiple revision operators with respect to sets of sentences (representing explanations), giving representation theorems. Finally, we relate the formulated operators with argumentative systems and default reasoning frameworks.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
In this article, we discuss some issues related to the intuitions of defeasible reasoning, in particular floating conclusions, reinstatement, and zombie paths. Defeasible logic serves as the formal basis for our analysis. We also make some comments on the comparison between defeasible logics and the