𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Defeasible reasoning and informal fallacies

✍ Scribed by Douglas Walton

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
560 KB
Volume
179
Category
Article
ISSN
0039-7857

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Explanations, belief revision and defeas
Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning
✍ Marcelo A. Falappa; Gabriele Kern-Isberner; GuillermoΒ R. Simari πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 215 KB

We present different constructions for nonprioritized belief revision, that is, belief changes in which the input sentences are not always accepted. First, we present the concept of explanation in a deductive way. Second, we define multiple revision operators with respect to sets of sentences (repre

Defeasible reasoning: A discussion of so
Defeasible reasoning: A discussion of some intuitions
✍ Grigoris Antoniou πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 115 KB

In this article, we discuss some issues related to the intuitions of defeasible reasoning, in particular floating conclusions, reinstatement, and zombie paths. Defeasible logic serves as the formal basis for our analysis. We also make some comments on the comparison between defeasible logics and the

Informal Reasoning and Burden of Proof
Informal Reasoning and Burden of Proof
✍ JEREMY N. BAILENSON; LANCE J. RIPS πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 898 KB

Informal arguments occur in casual discourse and typically feature participants trying to convince each other (or a third party) of their positions. As an argument progresses, one participant can accrue more burden of proof-will have to do more to prove he or she is correct. Some past studies have s