"Explanation and Understanding, perhaps von Wright's best-known book, showed the influence of Wittgenstein, but marked a clean break with the positivism of his youth. He suggested that human action could not be explained causally by scientific or 'natural' laws, but had to be understood 'intentional
Explanation and Understanding
β Scribed by G.H. von Wright
- Publisher
- Kegan Paul International
- Year
- 1971
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 253
- Series
- International library of philosophy and scientific method
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This volume distinguishes between two main traditions in the philosophy of science - the aristotelian, with its stress on explanation in terms of purpose and intentionality, and the galilean, which takes causal explanation as primary. It then traces the complex history of these competing traditions as they are manifested in such movements as positivism, idealism, Marxism and contemporary linguistic analysis. Hempels's theory of scientific explanation, the claims of cybernetics the rise of an analytic philosophy of action and the revival of hermenuetics are all discussed. The volume also deals with causal explanation, intentionality and teleological explanation,Β and explanation in history and the social sciences. The author concludes that explanation of human actions cannot be reduced to simple causality, and discusses the implications of this conclusion for the disciplines of history and sociology.
β¦ Table of Contents
Half Title......Page 1
Series Title......Page 2
Title Page......Page 3
Copyright......Page 4
Dedication......Page 5
Preface......Page 7
Contents......Page 11
I. Two Traditions......Page 21
II. Causality and Causal Explanation......Page 54
III. Intentionality and Teleological Explanation......Page 103
IV. Explanation in History and the Social Sciences......Page 152
I. Two Traditions......Page 189
II. Causality and Causal Explanation......Page 203
III. Intentionality and Teleological Explanation......Page 212
IV. Explanation in History and the Social Sciences......Page 219
References......Page 227
D......Page 243
M......Page 244
Y......Page 245
C......Page 246
E......Page 247
M......Page 248
T......Page 249
W......Page 250
International Library of Philosophy & Scientific Method......Page 252
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
From antiquity to the end of the twentieth century, philosophical discussions of understanding remained undeveloped, guided by a 'received view' that takes understanding to be nothing more than knowledge of an explanation. More recently, however, this received view has been criticized, and bold ne
This is the first book that attempts to analyze and define the methodology and values of contemporary accounts of adjudication, which can be divided into orthodox philosophies on the one hand and heretical accounts on the other. The author offers an incisive and original analysis of how these suppos
Alan Millar examines our understanding of why people think and act as they do. His key theme is that normative considerations form an indispensable part of the explanatory framework in terms of which we seek to understand each other. Millar defends a conception according to which normativity is link
Alan Millar examines our understanding of why people think and act as they do. His key theme is that normative considerations form an indispensable part of the explanatory framework in terms of which we seek to understand each other. Millar defends a conception according to which normativity is link