Paul Feyeraband famously asked, what's so great about science? One answer is that it has been surprisingly successful in getting things right about the natural world, more successful than non-scientific or pre-scientific systems, religion or philosophy. Science has been able to formulate theories t
Understanding, Explanation, and Scientific Knowledge
โ Scribed by Kareem Khalifa
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Year
- 2017
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 264
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
From antiquity to the end of the twentieth century, philosophical discussions of understanding remained undeveloped, guided by a 'received view' that takes understanding to be nothing more than knowledge of an explanation. More recently, however, this received view has been criticized, and bold new philosophical proposals about understanding have emerged in its place. In this book, Kareem Khalifa argues that the Read more...
โฆ Table of Contents
Machine generated contents note: 1. The Philosophy of Understanding --
1.1. Kinds of Understanding --
1.2. Degrees of Understanding --
1.3. The Nexus Principle --
1.4. The Scientific Knowledge Principle --
1.5. The Explanation-Knowledge-Science (EKS) Model --
1.6. The Received View of Understanding --
1.7. A Look Ahead --
2. An Illustration: Bjorken Scaling --
2.1. Preliminaries and Clarifications --
2.2. Bjorken on Scaling --
2.3. A Lack of Understanding --
2.4. Comparison with Batterman --
2.5. Comparison with De Regt --
2.6. Conclusion --
3. Understanding and Ability --
3.1. The Classic Ability Argument --
3.2. Resisting the Classic Ability Argument --
3.3. The Updated Ability Argument --
3.4. Pritchard on Cognitive Achievements --
3.5. Hills on Cognitive Control --
3.6. Grimm on Grasping --
3.7. Conclusion --
4. Objectual Understanding --
4.1. The Lay of the Land --
4.2. Robust Breadth --
4.3. Austere Breadth --
4.4. Robust Coherence --
4.5. Austere Coherence --
4.6. Conclusion --
5. Understanding Without Explanation? --
5.1. Lipton's Framework --
5.2. Putting Explanation Back into Understanding --
5.3. Examples of Modal Understanding --
5.4. The Galileo Example --
5.5. Unification via Tacit Analogy --
5.6. Tacit Understanding of Causes --
5.7. Conclusion: A Rapprochement? --
6. Understanding and True Belief --
6.1. Getting Our Bearings --
6.2. Historical Arguments --
6.3. Idealization Arguments --
6.4. Conclusion --
7. Lucky Understanding --
7.1. The Luck Questions --
7.2. Passe Compatibilism --
7.3. Nouveau Incompatibilism --
7.4. Argumentum ex Scientia --
7.5. Conclusion --
7.6. Excursus: Gettier Luck --
8. The Value of Understanding --
8.1. The Basic Value Question --
8.2. The Distinctive Value Question --
8.3. Conclusion: Understanding, Philosophy, and Scientific Knowledge.
โฆ Subjects
Explanation, Scientific Knowledge
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>With this defense of intensional realism as a philosophical foundation for understanding scientific procedures and grounding scientific knowledge, James Fetzer provides a systematic alternative to much of recent work on scientific theory. To Fetzer, the current state of understanding the 'laws' o
<p>Scientific thinking must be understood as an activity. The acts of interpretation, representation, and explanation are the cognitive processes by which scientific thinking leads to understanding. The book explores the nature of these processes and describes how scientific thinking can only be gra
This book, in its first part, contains units of conceptual history of several topics of physics based on the research in physics education and research based articles with regard to several topics involved in teaching science in general and physics in particular. The second part of the book include