Can music really arouse emotions? If so, what emotions, and how? Why do listeners respond with different emotions to the same piece of music? Are emotions to music different from other emotions? Why do we respond to fictional events in art as if they were real, even though we know they're not? What
Explaining Emotions
β Scribed by AmΓ©lie O. Rorty
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Year
- 1980
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 553
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The challenge of explaining the emotions has engaged the attention of the best minds in philosophy and science throughout history. Part of the fascination has been that the emotions resist classification. As adequate account therefore requires receptivity to knowledge from a variety of sources. The philosopher must inform himself of the relevant empirical investigation to arrive at a definition, and the scientist cannot afford to be naive about the assumptions built into his conceptual apparatus.The contributors to this volume have approached the problem of characterizing and classifying emotions from the perspectives of neurophysiology, psychology, and social psychology as well as that of philosophical psychology. They discuss the difficulties that arise in classifying the emotions, assessing their appropriateness and rationality, and determining their function in motivating moral action.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In Explaining Explanation, David-Hillel Ruben provides a non-technical discussion of some of the main historical attempts to explain the concept of explanation, examining the works of Plato, Aristotle, John Stuart Mill, and Carl Hempel. Building on and developing the insights of these historical fig
I. Getting our bearings -- II. Plato on explanation -- III. Aristotle on explanation -- IV. Mill and Hempel on explanation -- V. The ontology of explanation -- VI. Arguments, laws, and explanation -- VII. A realist theory of explanation.
How does one explain the concept of 'explanation'? The attempts of Plato, Aristotle, Mill and Hempel are here examined, and the author provides his own solution to this question, both within philosophy of science and epistemology in general.</div>