I. Getting our bearings -- II. Plato on explanation -- III. Aristotle on explanation -- IV. Mill and Hempel on explanation -- V. The ontology of explanation -- VI. Arguments, laws, and explanation -- VII. A realist theory of explanation.
Explaining Explanation
โ Scribed by David-Hillel Ruben
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 278
- Series
- Problems of Philosophy
- Edition
- New edition
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
In Explaining Explanation, David-Hillel Ruben provides a non-technical discussion of some of the main historical attempts to explain the concept of explanation, examining the works of Plato, Aristotle, John Stuart Mill, and Carl Hempel. Building on and developing the insights of these historical figures, he concludes with his own original and challenging view of explanation. Ruben relates the concept of explanation to both epistemological and metaphysical issues. Not content to confine the concept to the realm of philosophy of science, he examines it within a far more broadly conceived theory of knowledge.
โฆ Table of Contents
Book Cover......Page 1
Title......Page 4
Contents......Page 5
Preface and Acknowledgements......Page 10
Getting our Bearings......Page 14
Plato on Explanation......Page 58
Aristotle on Explanation......Page 90
Mill and Hempel on Explanation......Page 123
The Ontology of Explanation......Page 168
Arguments, Laws, and Explanation......Page 194
A Realist Theory of Explanation......Page 222
Notes......Page 247
Bibliography......Page 269
Name Index......Page 275
Subject Index......Page 277
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
How does one explain the concept of 'explanation'? The attempts of Plato, Aristotle, Mill and Hempel are here examined, and the author provides his own solution to this question, both within philosophy of science and epistemology in general.</div>
This book offers an examination of functional explanation as it is used in biology and the social sciences, and focuses on the kinds of philosophical presuppositions that such explanations carry with them. McLaughlin gives a critical review of the debate on functional explanation in the philosophy o