๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Expected utility and approval voting

โœ Scribed by Peter C. Fishburn; Steven J. Brams


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
557 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
8756-6079

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Approval voting is concerned with the decision behavior of organizations and societal systems. As with other voting procedures, it elicits and converts input from voters into a social decision. Under approval voting, each voter in a multicandidate election can vote for as many candidates as he wishes. The candidate with the most votes is elected. Approval voting is analyzed here from the viewpoint of expected utility maximizing voters. Approximately optimal voting strategies are developed. The relative abilities of votes for different numbers of candidates to affect the outcome are assessed, and the issue of equity among voters is addressed. It is argued that approval voting is more equitable than the common plurality voting system.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Strategy stability and sincerity in appr
โœ Yunfeng Luo; Chaoyuan Yue; Ting Chen ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 382 KB

This paper investigates the problem of strategy stability and sincerity in approval voting. It gives "strong" support for Fishburn's claim that, among all nonranked voting systems, approval voting is the uniformly most sincere one whenever the number of candidates is not greater than 5.

Efficacy, power and equity under approva
โœ Peter C. Fishburn; Steven J. Brams ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› Springer US ๐ŸŒ English โš– 511 KB

Approval voting allows each voter to vote for as many candidates as he wishes in a multicandidate election. Previous studies show that approval voting compares favorably with other practicable election systems. The present study examines the extent to which votes for different numbers of candidates

Multicriteria approval: application of a
โœ Niall M. Fraser; Jaret W. Hauge ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 161 KB

Multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods generally require information that is difficult and expensive to obtain. It is shown in this paper that given an ordering of criteria by importance, and whether each alternative is above the average evaluation of the alternatives for each criterion, consi