𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts produced by heart valve prostheses exposed to a 1.5-T MR system

✍ Scribed by Frank G. Shellock; Stacy M. Morisoli


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
293 KB
Volume
4
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Ex vivo testing techniques were used to determine the ferromagnetic qualities of, presence of heating in, and artifacts produced by 13 different heart valve prostheses exposed to a 1.5‐T (64‐MHz) magnetic resonance (MR) system. None of the heart valve prostheses showed a measurable deflection in the 1.5‐T static magnetic field. Only minimal artifacts were produced during MR imaging with a fast spoiled GRASS (gradient‐recalled acquisition in the steady state) pulse sequence. The largest temperature changes measured during a “worst case” MR imaging sequence (estimated average specific absorption rate, 2.5 W/kg; estimated spatial peak specific absorption rate, 7.6 W/kg) were +0.2°C with the implant imaged “in air” and +0.3°C with the implant imaged in normal saline. Therefore, MR procedures performed with a 1.5‐T (64‐MHz) MR system may be performed safely in patients with any of the 13 different heart valve prostheses evaluated in this study.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ex Vivo Evaluation of Ferromagnetism, He
✍ Linda-Lynn Pagan; Frank G. Shellock; R. James Brenner; Barry Rothman 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 357 KB

## Abstract Three breast tissue expanders were evaluated for compatibility with MR imaging (1.5 Tesla). The metallic components of the breast tissue expanders were shown to be nonferromagnetic, heating .2°C and the artifacts varied. These results indicate that MR procedures may be performed safely

Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism and
✍ Frank G. Shellock; Stacy M. Morisoli 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 360 KB

## Abstract Magnetic resonance (MR) procedures are contraindicated for patients with certain ferromagnetic biomedical implants, primarily owing to the risk of movement or dislodgment of the implants by the static magnetic field. An additional concern is the amount of artifact that the implant produ