Evolved sex differences and occupational segregation
β Scribed by Kingsley R. Browne
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 152 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.349
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Average sex differences in workplace outcomes are often assumed to be products of a malfunctioning labor market that discourages women from nontraditional occupations and a biased educational system that leaves women inadequately prepared for scientific and technical work. Rather than being a product purely of discriminatory demand, however, many sex differences in occupational distribution are at least partially a result of an imbalance in supply. Sex differences in both temperament and cognitive ability, which are products of our evolutionary history, predispose men and women toward different occupational behavior. The tendency of men to predominate in fields imposing high quantitative demands, high physical risk, and low social demands, and the tendency of women to be drawn to less quantitatively demanding fields, safer jobs, and jobs with a higher social content are, at least in part, artifacts of an evolutionary history that has left the human species with a sexually dimorphic mind. These differences are proximately mediated by sex hormones. Copyright Β© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This article presents data from an exploratory study carried out over a 12 month period using qualitative research methods. The study tests theoretical concepts adapted from the model of the 'vicious circles of job segregation' (Collinson et al., Managing to Discriminate. Routledge, London, 1990) in
This study extends previous research addressing sex differences in perceived occupational barriers and evaluates the mediating role of causal attributions in the relationship between perceived occupational barriers and career maturity. Participants (85 women and 30 men) listed their perceived barrie
1. Investigations were made to determine whether the two giant petrel species segregate by gender and species in relation to the stage of the annual cycle. The individual foraging behaviour of 14 male and 11 female northern giant petrels (Macronectes halli) and 13 male and 15 female southern giant p