𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Evaluation of manual and automatic segmentation of the mouse heart from CINE MR images

✍ Scribed by Edwin Heijman; Jean-Paul Aben; Cindy Penners; Petra Niessen; René Guillaume; Guillaume van Eys; Klaas Nicolay; Gustav J. Strijkers


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
365 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose

To compare global functional parameters determined from a stack of cinematographic MR images of mouse heart by a manual segmentation and an automatic segmentation algorithm.

Materials and Methods

The manual and automatic segmentation results of 22 mouse hearts were compared. The automatic segmentation was based on propagation of a minimum cost algorithm in polar space starting from manually drawn contours in one heart phase. Intra‐ and interobserver variability as well as validity of the automatic segmentation was determined. To test the reproducibility of the algorithm the variability was calculated from the intra‐ and interobserver input.

Results

The mean time of segmentation for one dataset was around 10 minutes and ≈2.5 hours for automatic and manual segmentation, respectively. There were no significant differences between the automatic and the manual segmentation except for the end systolic epicardial volume. The automatically derived volumes correlated well with the manually derived volumes (R^2^ = 0.90); left ventricular mass with and without papillary muscle showed a correlation R^2^ of 0.74 and 0.76, respectively. The manual intraobserver variability was superior to the interobserver variability and the variability of the automatic segmentation, while the manual interobserver variability was comparable to the variability of the automatic segmentation. The automatic segmentation algorithm reduced the bias of the intra‐ and interobserver variability.

Conclusion

We conclude that automatic segmentation of the mouse heart provides a fast and valid alternative to manual segmentation of the mouse heart. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Evaluation of hippocampal volume based o
✍ Thomas M. Doring; Tadeu T.A. Kubo; L. Celso H. Cruz Jr; Mario F. Juruena; Jiosef 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 385 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose: To compare the hippocampal volumes in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls, obtained by applying different segmentation methods (manual, Freesurfer [FS], and FSL). ## Materials and Methods: The study included 27 patients with BD and 40 healthy controls

Segmentation of cardiac cine MR images o
✍ Francesco Sardanelli; Matteo Quarenghi; Giovanni Di Leo; Leonardo Boccaccini; An 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 382 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To test interactive semiautomated methods (ISAM) vs. manual contouring (MC) in segmenting cardiac cine MR images. ## Materials and Methods Short‐axis images of 10 consecutive patients (1.5–81.5 years of age) were evaluated by a trained radiologist (R1) and a low‐trained en

Right ventricular volumes and ejection f
✍ Marga B. Rominger; Georg F. Bachmann; Wolfgang Pabst; Wigbert S. Rau 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB

Our goal was to establish right ventricular (RV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) values in normal volunteers with fast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using a breath-hold technique, to assess the frequency and severity of RVEF abnormality in cardiac patients and to compare RV with left ventricular