𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Error propagation analysis in color measurement and imaging

✍ Scribed by Peter D. Burns; Roy S. Berns


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
202 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0361-2317

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We apply multivariate error-propagation analy-Uncertainty or noise in a detected or recorded color signal can arise from many sources, e.g., detector dark sis to color-signal transformations. Results are given that indicate how linear, matrix, and nonlinear transforma-current, exposure shot noise, calibration variation, or varying operating conditions. If a physical model of the system tions influence the mean, variance, and covariance of color-measurements and color-images. Since many signal and its associated signal processing is available, the influence of various sources on system performance can be processing paths include these steps, the analysis is applicable to color-measurement and imaging systems. Ex-understood for both color-measurement 1-8 and imaging applications. [11][12] In addition, statistical aspects of human vi-pressions are given that allow image noise or error propagation for a spectrophotometer, colorimeter, or digital sion can also be explicitly included in the analysis. 13 This approach allows the comparison of design/technology camera. In a computed example, error statistics are propagated from tristimulus values to CIELAB coordinates.

choices in terms of system performance requirements, e.g., color error or signal-to-noise ratio. We consider the case The resulting signal covariance is interpreted in terms of CIELAB error ellipsoids and the mean value of color-of general stochastic error sources, which can be functions of exposure level, wavelength, etc. difference measures, DE* ab and DE* 94 . The application of this analysis to system design is also illustrated by relat-Measurements of systematic error are often used to ing a DE* 94 tolerance to equivalent tristimulus-value error evaluate accuracy during system calibration. Methods of statistics.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Application of highlight removal and mul
✍ Chunhua Yang; Canhui Xu; Weihua Gui; Kaijun Zhou πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 426 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Machine vision based analysis provides a novel technology for froth flotation monitoring. Froth images collected are characterized by fully occupied bubbles with different size and shape under various illuminations. Convex bubbles lead to the formation of white spots that seriously affe

CAUSALITY, MEASUREMENT ERROR AND MULTICO
✍ JAMES V. ZIDEK; HUBERT WONG; NHU D. LE; RICK BURNETT πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 717 KB

This paper demonstrates that measurement error can conspire with multicollinearity among explanatory variables to mislead an investigator. A causal variable measured with error may be overlooked and its significance transferred to a surrogate. The latter's significance can then be entirely spurious,

Analytical error propagation in diffusio
✍ Aziz Hatim Poonawalla; Xiaohong Joe Zhou πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 351 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To develop an analytical formalism describing how noise and selection of diffusion‐weighting scheme propagate through the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) computational chain into variances of the diffusion tensor elements, and errors in the relative anisotropy (RA) and fracti