๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Error Analysis of Three Spherotensiometric Methods

โœ Scribed by Ling Zhang; Lei Ren; Stanley Hartland

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
176 KB
Volume
209
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9797

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis

The error analysis in the determination of interfacial tension and contact angle using sphere tensiometry was fulfilled using the total differential analysis. The average error in interfacial tension for all three methods (the maximum force point method, two points method (F0 and H0/R) and process curve method) is smaller than 0.05 mN/m and average error in contact angle is smaller than 0.9 degrees. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Error analysis of the reproducing kernel
Error analysis of the reproducing kernel particle method
โœ Weimin Han; Xueping Meng ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 603 KB

Interest in meshfree (or meshless) methods has grown rapidly in recent years in solving boundary value problems (BVPs) arising in mechanics, especially in dealing with dicult problems involving large deformation, moving discontinuities, etc. In this paper, we provide a theoretical analysis of the re