Erratum to “Beta decay of 56Cu”: [Nucl. Phys. A 695 (2001) 69]
✍ Scribed by R. Borcea; J. Äystö; E. Caurier; P. Dendooven; J. Döring; M. Gierlik; M. Górska; H. Grawe; M. Hellström; Z. Janas; A. Jokinen; M. Karny; R. Kirchner; M. La Commara; K. Langanke; G. Martı́nez-Pinedo; P. Mayet; A. Nieminen; F. Nowacki; H. Penttilä; A. Płochocki; M. Rejmund; E. Roeckl; C. Schlegel; K. Schmidt; R. Schwengner; M. Sawicka
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 20 KB
- Volume
- 703
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0375-9474
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Some errors were discovered [1] in the computer code on which the calculations presented in this paper were based. This leads to changes in Figs. 2-7 and to modifications to some of the conclusions of the paper. The corrected figures are shown below; the captions are the same as for the original fig
In a subsequent analysis a coding error was discovered in the treatment of the short range correlations. Correcting the error resulted in an increase of the neutrinoless double beta decay matrix elements. Here we provide the most relevant correct numerical results. The corrected Table (replacing Tab