Efficacy and safety of novel antipsychotics: a critical review
โ Scribed by Matteo Balestrieri; Claudio Vampini; Cesario Bellantuono
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 99 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6222
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Efficacy and safety of novel antipsychotic (AP) drugs (amisulpride, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and zotepine) have been reviewed. Data on their antipsychotic efficacy and side effects profile have been evaluated only on the basis of controlled trials so far published. Overall, all these drugs have shown an antipsychotic efficacy on positive symptoms of schizophrenia similar to that of the conventional AP drugs. On negative symptoms, all novel AP drugs, except quetiapine and ziprasidone, demonstrated a better efficacy than haloperidol. Long-term efficacy of these AP drugs in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia needs to be explored by further, better-designed, epidemiological studies. The safety profile shows that the novel AP drugs are generally well-tolerated and induce significantly less acute extrapyramidal side effects in comparison with haloperidol. Some methodological flaws in the experimental design of the clinical trials analysed are discussed. Although these novel AP drugs have potential clinical advantages, a number of relevant questions still remain to be addressed, in order to establish the impact of these drugs in the overall treatment of schizophrenia. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Background Although little doubt exists among practising clinicians in old age psychiatry about the efficacy and safety of ECT in depression, opinions about acceptability differ widely. The objectives of this review were to determine the efficacy and safety of ECT based on both rand
## Abstract The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of herbal medicines (HMs), as a monotherapy or adjunct therapy, compared to placebo or conventional approaches in the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD). We conducted a systematic review of randomized control
## OBJECTIVES: The endoscopic modifi ed Lothrop procedure (EMLP; also known as Draf III or frontal drillout) has recently gained popularity as a minimally-invasive alternative to frontal sinus obliteration. This systematic analysis was designed to assess the safety and effi cacy of the EMLP. STUDY
## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP; also known as Draf III or frontal drillout) has recently gained popularity as a minimally invasive alternative to frontal sinus obliteration. This systematic analysis was designed to assess the safety and effica