𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effects of the combination of insulin and glibenclamide in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with secondary failure to oral hypoglycaemic agents

✍ Scribed by S. Stenman; P. -H. Groop; C. Saloranta; K. J. Tötterman; F. Fyhrqvist; L. Groop


Publisher
Springer
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Weight
971 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
0012-186X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The effects of combined insulin and sulfonylurea therapy on glycaemic control and B-cell function was studied in 15 Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients who had failed on treatment with oral hypoglycaemic agents. The patients were first treated with insulin alone for four months. Five patients were given two daily insulin doses and ten patients one dose. During insulin treatment the fasting plasma glucose fell from 14.5 +/- 0.8 to 8.8 +/- 0.4 mmol/l and the HbA1 concentration from 12.6 +/- 0.4 to 9.2 +/- 0.2%. This improvement of glycaemic control was associated with a suppression of basal (from 0.31 +/- 0.04 to 0.10 +/- 0.02 nmol/l) and glucagon-stimulated (from 0.50 +/- 0.08 to 0.19 +/- 0.04 nmol/l) C-peptide concentrations. Four months after starting insulin therapy the patients were randomised to a four-month double-blind cross-over treatment with insulin combined with either 15 mg glibenclamide per day or with placebo. Addition of glibenclamide to insulin resulted in a further reduction of the fasting plasma glucose (7.9 +/- 0.5 mmol/l) and HbA1 (8.3 +/- 0.2%) concentration whereas the basal (0.21 +/- 0.03 nmol/l) and glucagon-stimulated C-peptide concentrations (0.34 +/- 0.06 nmol/l) increased again. Addition of placebo to insulin had no effect. The daily insulin dose could be reduced by 25% after addition of glibenclamide to insulin, while it remained unchanged when insulin was combined with placebo. The fasting free insulin concentration did not differ between the glibenclamide and placebo periods (28 +/- 6 vs 30 +/- 5 mmol/l).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effects of a combination of bedtime inte
✍ M. Krempf; T. Godeau; S. Ranganathan; P. Blanchard; P. Ritz; B. Charbonnel 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 603 KB

The effect of a subcutaneous injection of an intermediate-acting insulin at bedtime combined with glibenclamide has been evaluated in 16 non-insulin-diabetic patients with secondary failure to respond to oral agents. The patients showed poor metabolic control (HbA1 greater than 11%) after two months

A combination of once daily insulin and
✍ Fonseca, V A ;D'Souza, V. ;Bell, J L ;Dandona, P 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 434 KB

## Abstract Twenty eight patients with non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who were not adequately controlled with maximum doses of sulphonylureas and metformin (Group I; n=13) or with insulin injections (Group II; n=15) were treated with a combination of insulin injections in the morni

The number of glomeruli in Type 1 (insul
✍ T. F. Bendtsen; J. R. Nyengaard 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 748 KB

The number of glomeruli per kidney in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) and Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients was estimated by an unbiased stereological method: the fractionator. No significant differences were observed between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients without severe diabetic glom

The effect of hyperglycaemia on the abso
✍ A. Hoffman; Y. Fischer; D. Gilhar; I. Raz 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 269 KB

We have studied the absorption of glibenclamide 10 mg as a single morning dose in 7 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, comparing normoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic states. The maximal glibenclamide plasma concentrations were significantly higher in the normoglycaemic than in the h

Multicentre study to assess quality of l
✍ Barnett, AH ;Jones, D Bowen ;Burden, AC ;Janes, JM ;Sinclair, A ;Small, M ;Tinda 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 530 KB

## Abstract Quality of life, glycaemic control and frequency of hypoglycaemia were compared in 93 moderate to poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes patients randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: Group A continued on oral hypoglycaemics, Group B switched to twice‐daily fixed mixture of hu