Effects of subject and rater characteristics on the accuracy of visual analysis of single subject data
β Scribed by Stephen B. Richards; Ronald L. Taylor; Rangasamy Ramasamy
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 160 KB
- Volume
- 34
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0033-3085
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The accuracy of interpretation of single subject data was evaluated by comparing raters' visual analysis of behavior change with statistical determination of behavior change using the split-middle methods of trend estimation. In addition, the effects of rater background (undergraduate, graduate student) and characteristics of the fictitious student (gender, label) on the ratings were determined. Results indicated that the accuracy of visual analysis was less than chance (47%). Rater and student characteristics, for the most part, did not affect the ratings. Implications of these results are discussed.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## PROBLEM Clinical judgment consists of accuracy (outcome) and the contributing ratiocinations (process). In quasi-clinical contexts, accuracy is unrelated to experience('\* but may be increased by formal training'l', 12). Process designs have suggested that cognitive set(ls), sex of judge(17\* l
Paroxetine improve the quality of sleep and the ease of waking up on subjective measures of sleep (the LSEQ). Dothiepin in contrast improved the ease of getting to sleep, but caused a reduced quality of sleep and a `hangover' eect the next morning.
Studied whether any differential effects of anxiety and depression could be discerned in the anagram performance, ratings of cognitive interference, and subjective evaluation of anagram performance displayed by college students. Seventy-two undergraduates (36 male, 36 female) were selected to partic
Compared validity ratings of feedback statements by Ss to determine whether a response set was present to endorse positively worded statements as more accurate than negatively worded ones and to determine whether negative wording interfered with Ss' abilit to distingulsh "true" from " f a d ' feedba