Effects of post-trainingd-amphetamine on acquisition of an appetitive autoshaped lever press response in rats
โ Scribed by Alejandro Oscos; Joe L. Martinez; James L. McGaugh
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1988
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 236 KB
- Volume
- 95
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0033-3158
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This experiment examined the effect of post-training d-amphetamine on retention in an appetitive autoshaping conditioning situation. Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were first given ten autoshaping trials, followed by either three or four additional sessions of 50 trials (70 s intertrial interval) on which the conditioned stimulus (the extension of an illuminated Plexiglas lever for 10 s) and unconditioned stimulus (a 45 mg food pellet), were paired. d-Amphetamine (1 or 2 mg/kg) or saline was administered IP either immediately or 2 h following training. Rats injected with 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine immediately after the first training session made significantly more responses during the conditioned stimulus presentation on the following daily session of 50 trials. Thus, the amphetamine-treated rats acquired the lever press response faster than those given only saline. The amphetamine effects were time dependent: no significant effects were found if the injection was delayed until 2 h following training. These results agree with the findings of other instrumental aversive facilitation studies and suggest that d-amphetamine may enhance retention of the classically conditioned components of autoshaping.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Pretraining IP injection of naloxone (0.3 mg/kg) or amphetamine (2 mg/kg) enhanced performance during acquisition, but did not improve retention of active avoidance responses in rats. Naloxone (0.1 or 3 mg/kg) had no effect on acquisition or on retention. The combination of naloxone (0.3 mg/kg) plus
The effect of home cage environmental stimuli on learning and the effects on retention of the presence or absence of these familiar contextual training stimuli during the retention test (Experiment 1) or during the retention interval (Experiment 2) were examined using 10-day-old rats, a multidirecti