๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Effects of post-trainingd-amphetamine on acquisition of an appetitive autoshaped lever press response in rats

โœ Scribed by Alejandro Oscos; Joe L. Martinez; James L. McGaugh


Publisher
Springer
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Weight
236 KB
Volume
95
Category
Article
ISSN
0033-3158

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This experiment examined the effect of post-training d-amphetamine on retention in an appetitive autoshaping conditioning situation. Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were first given ten autoshaping trials, followed by either three or four additional sessions of 50 trials (70 s intertrial interval) on which the conditioned stimulus (the extension of an illuminated Plexiglas lever for 10 s) and unconditioned stimulus (a 45 mg food pellet), were paired. d-Amphetamine (1 or 2 mg/kg) or saline was administered IP either immediately or 2 h following training. Rats injected with 1 mg/kg d-amphetamine immediately after the first training session made significantly more responses during the conditioned stimulus presentation on the following daily session of 50 trials. Thus, the amphetamine-treated rats acquired the lever press response faster than those given only saline. The amphetamine effects were time dependent: no significant effects were found if the injection was delayed until 2 h following training. These results agree with the findings of other instrumental aversive facilitation studies and suggest that d-amphetamine may enhance retention of the classically conditioned components of autoshaping.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effect of naloxone and amphetamine on ac
โœ Susana Fulginiti; Liliana M. Cancela ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1983 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 381 KB

Pretraining IP injection of naloxone (0.3 mg/kg) or amphetamine (2 mg/kg) enhanced performance during acquisition, but did not improve retention of active avoidance responses in rats. Naloxone (0.1 or 3 mg/kg) had no effect on acquisition or on retention. The combination of naloxone (0.3 mg/kg) plus

The effect of home cage stimuli on acqui
โœ Dr. James R. Misanin; Nancy A. Lariviere; Alan E. Turns; Laurie E. Turns; Charle ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 700 KB

The effect of home cage environmental stimuli on learning and the effects on retention of the presence or absence of these familiar contextual training stimuli during the retention test (Experiment 1) or during the retention interval (Experiment 2) were examined using 10-day-old rats, a multidirecti