Effect of naloxone and amphetamine on acquisition and memory consolidation of active avoidance responses in rats
โ Scribed by Susana Fulginiti; Liliana M. Cancela
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 381 KB
- Volume
- 79
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0033-3158
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Pretraining IP injection of naloxone (0.3 mg/kg) or amphetamine (2 mg/kg) enhanced performance during acquisition, but did not improve retention of active avoidance responses in rats. Naloxone (0.1 or 3 mg/kg) had no effect on acquisition or on retention. The combination of naloxone (0.3 mg/kg) plus amphetamine (2 mg/kg) did not produce the facilitation observed when each of the two drugs was administered alone. Pretreatment with the higher dose of naloxone (3 mg/kg) blocked the facilitative effect of amphetamine on acquisition. Post-training administration of naloxone (0.3 mg/kg) or amphetamine (2 mg/kg) improved retention. Naloxone (0.1 or 3 mg/kg) had no effect. When naloxone and amphetamine were combined, at respective doses of 0.3 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg, the improvement did not occur, i.e., the higher dose of naloxone prevented the facilitative effect of amphetamine. In addition, an ineffective dose of amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg), given either pre- or post-training together with the lower dose of naloxone (0.1 mg/kg), produced a significant enhancement of acquisition or consolidation, respectively. The results are consistent with the possibility that naloxone might exert its facilitative action on acquisition and memory consolidation through the release of catecholaminergic systems from inhibitory influences of opioids.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Two experiments examined the effects of various doses of /-amphetamine on locomotor activity, two-way avoidance, and intertrial responses in rats that were 15, 17, 21, 36, and 90 days of age. In the first experiment, testing began 20 min after drug administration and 100 avoidance trials were given.
The effect of home cage environmental stimuli on learning and the effects on retention of the presence or absence of these familiar contextual training stimuli during the retention test (Experiment 1) or during the retention interval (Experiment 2) were examined using 10-day-old rats, a multidirecti