𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effects of bolus injections and continuous infusions of somatostatin and placebo in patients with cirrhosis: A double-blind hemodynamic investigation

✍ Scribed by Isabel Cirera; Faust Feu; Angelo Luca; Joan C. García-Pagan; Mercedes Fernández; Angels Escorsell; Jaime Bosch; Joan Rodés


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
727 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-9139

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The present double-blind study was aimed at investigating the hemodynamic and humoral effects of somatostatin or placebo in patients with cirrhosis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either an injection of 250 pg of somatostatin followed by a constant infusion of somatostatin at 250 pg/h (n = 13), an injection of 250 pg of somatostatin followed by a 500 pg/h continuous infusion (n = lo), or an injection of placebo followed by a placebo infusion (n = 9). Placebo had no effect. Somatostatin bolus markedly decreased the hepatic venous pressure gradient: by 52% at 1 minute; P < .001; 19% at 3 minutes, P < .01; and by 13% at 5 minutes, P < .04.

Azygos blood flow decreased similarly by 45% at 1 minute, P < .001; 16% at 3 minutes, P < .02; and 9.5% at 5 minutes, P = .05. Mean arterial pressure increased by 25% (P < .001). Continuous somatostatin infusions (250 or 500 pg/h) had no systemic effects, but significantly reduced hepatic venous pressure gradient (250 pgk: -6.1%, P < .05 and 500 pg/h: -15%, P < .01) and hepatic Azygos blood flow was not changed after 250 pg/h infusion but was reduced after 500 pg/h (-23%, P < .02).

Somatostatin but not placebo, suppressed glucagon to normal levels. This study shows that a bolus injection of somatostatin caused an immediate and marked decrease of hepatic venous pressure gradient and azygos blood flow. Continuous infusion of somatostatin had a mild but sustained effect on splanchnic hemodynamics; this effect was more pronounced with the higher dose. (IHEP-blood flow (250 pglh: -lo%, 500 pg/h: -18%, P < .05).


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Double-blind investigation of the effect
✍ Faust Feu; Josep M. Bordas; Joan C. Garcia-Pagán; Dr. Jaime Bosch; Joan Rodés 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 728 KB

This study was aimed at investigating the effects of propranolol on esophageal variceal pressure in patients with portal hypertension. Variceal pressure was measured at endoscopy using a miniature pressure-sensitive gauge in 20 patients with portal hypertension. Measurements were obtained under bas

Placebo and nocebo effects in randomized
✍ Maxine de la Cruz; David Hui; Henrique A. Parsons; Eduardo Bruera 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 177 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: A significant response to placebo in randomized controlled trials of treatments for cancer‐related fatigue (CRF) had been reported. A retrospective study was conducted to determine the frequency and predictors of response to placebo effect and nocebo effects in patients

A double-blind, placebo-controlled asses
✍ Rory L. Marraccini; Charles F. Reynolds III; Patricia R. Houck; Mark D. Miller; 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 77 KB 👁 2 views

The authors assessed the severity of nortriptyline's side-effects in older patients with recurrent major depression during placebo-controlled, double-blind maintenance therapy. Data were from 37 patients completing 2-3 years of maintenance therapy; 29 were on nortriptyline and eight were on placebo.

The efficacy of EGb 761 in patients with
✍ B. Hofferberth 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 969 KB

Forty patients diagnosed as suffering from senile dementia of the Alzheimer type received either 80mg Ginkgo biloba special extract (GBE)\* or matching placebo t.i.d. for three months in a randomized, double blind study of the efficacy and tolerance of GBE. The patients were assessed using a test ba