𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effect of the stage of growth, wilting and inoculation in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) silages, III. Changes in the herbage and silage protein profiles

✍ Scribed by Laura Cavallarin; Giorgio Borreani


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
183 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-5142

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of stage of growth, field wilting and inoculation with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on the protein profile of herbage and silage were studied on field peas (Pisum sativum L.) harvested at four progressive morphological stages (end of flowering, I; beginning of pod filling, II; advanced pod filling, III; beginning of ripening, IV). The herbage was field wilted to a dry matter (DM) content around 330 g kg^βˆ’1^, for each stage of growth. The unwilted and wilted herbages were ensiled with (I) and without (C) a LAB inoculant.

RESULTS: As a result of the advancing maturity of the crop, the main protein component was Rubisco in the early stages and seed storage proteins in the more advanced stages, due to the redistribution of organic nitrogen during seed filling. Extensive degradation of Rubisco occurred in all the silages, without any effect of inoculation or wilting. A good preservation of the proteins was observed in stage IV for both unwilted and wilted silages, without further protein preservation due to LAB inoculation.

CONCLUSION: Protein protection observed in the more mature pea silage was due to the protein type and its localization and not to the level of DM at ensiling or to the inoculation. Copyright Β© 2007 Society of Chemical Industry


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effect of the stage of growth, wilting a
✍ Giorgio Borreani; Laura Cavallarin; Sara Antoniazzi; Ernesto Tabacco πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 118 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract The stage of growth, field wilting and inoculation with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) effects were studied by ensiling herbage of field pea (__Pisum sativum__ L.) at four consecutive stages. Stands of semi‐leafless field pea, sown in spring, were harvested at four progressive morphological