## Abstract The glutathione (GSH) S‐conjugation of 1,2‐epoxy‐3‐(4′‐nitrophenoxy)propane was catalysed predominantly by microsomal glutathione S‐transferase (mGST) in __Penicillium chrysogenum__. The specific mGST activity unlike the cytosolic GST (cGST) activity increased substantially when the pen
Effect of sulforaphane on glutathione-adduct formation and on glutathione_S_transferase-dependent detoxification of acrylamide in Caco-2 cells
✍ Scribed by Rita Pernice; Johanna Hauder; Peter Koehler; Paola Vitaglione; Vincenzo Fogliano; Veronika Somoza
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 296 KB
- Volume
- 53
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1613-4125
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The toxicity of dietary acrylamide (AA) depends on its biotransformation pathways, in which phase I cytochrome P‐450 enzymes transform AA into glycidamide. The phase II enzyme glutathione_S_transferase (GST) catalyses the conjugation of AA with glutathione (GSH). GST induction by phytochemicals like sulforaphane (SFN) plays a role in chemoprevention. Here, the effect of SFN on the detoxification of AA through GSH conjugation was studied in Caco‐2 cells. GSH adducts with AA and SFN were synthesized, identified by NMR and quantified by LC‐MS/MS. Caco‐2 cells were treated with either 2.5 mM AA, 10 μM SFN or the combination of both for 24 h. Concentrations of GSH conjugates (GSH‐AA, GSH‐SFN, SFN‐GSH‐AA), AA and SFN were analysed by LC‐MS/MS. GSH contents and GST activity were determined photometrically. GST activity was increased after treatment of the cells with SFN (38±6%, p≤0.05) or AA (25±4%, p≤0.05). GSH concentrations decreased after all treatments. Quantitative data of GSH adduct formation showed that the reaction between GSH and SFN is favoured over that between GSH and AA. The data suggest that SFN might impair the GSH‐dependent detoxification of AA by SFN‐GSH adduct formation and, thus, lower the GSH concentrations available for its reaction with AA.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We previously demonstrated that P-glycoprotein and MRP2 contribute to the secretory transport of grepafloxacin in the small intestine. Although inhibitors of these secretory transporters increased absorptive transport of grepafloxacin, secretory transport was not altered in Caco-2 cells, as determin