✦ LIBER ✦

Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials

✍ Scribed by Chandra Balachandran; Alexander I. Klistorner; Stuart L. Graham

Book ID: 110422087
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2003
Tongue: English
Weight: 309 KB
Volume: 106
Category: Article
ISSN: 0012-4486
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022571530152

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The influence of defocus on multifocal v

The influence of defocus on multifocal visual evoked potentials

✍ Christina Pieh; Michael B. Hoffmann; Michael Bach 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 265 KB

Effects of stimulus orientation on spati

Effects of stimulus orientation on spatial frequency function of the visual evoked potential

✍ Kenji Arakawa; Shozo Tobimatsu; Shizuka Kurita-Tashima; Miyuki Nakayama; Jun-Ich 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 69 KB

The effect of stimulus orientation on th

The effect of stimulus orientation on the visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis

✍ Dr. John Camisa; Leland H. Mylin; Ivan Bodis-Wollner 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 764 KB

Spectral Analysis of the Visual Evoked P

Spectral Analysis of the Visual Evoked Potential (VEP): Effects of Stimulus Luminance

✍ J.W. Jutai; J.H. Gruzelier; J.F. Connolly 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 899 KB

The effect of stimulus intensity on visu

The effect of stimulus intensity on visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transmission time

✍ C. R. Lines; M. D. Rugg; A. D. Milner 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 981 KB

Effect of stimulus field size and locali

Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response

✍ Osamu Katsumi; Tatsuo Hirose; Tsuyoshi Tanino 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 574 KB

The role of the central and peripheral stimulus fields on monocular and binocular amplitude and binocular summation of the pattern reversal visual evoked response were investigated. When the central stimulus field size was smaller than 2.4 degrees, there was no significant difference between the amp