𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The effect of stimulus intensity on visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transmission time

✍ Scribed by C. R. Lines; M. D. Rugg; A. D. Milner


Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
981 KB
Volume
57
Category
Article
ISSN
0014-4819

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The relationship between latency of audi
✍ Piotr Jaskownki; Krzysztof Rybarczyk; Feliks Jaroszyk πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Guilford Publishing Inc 🌐 English βš– 639 KB

The effects of loudness on the latency of evoked potentials and on simple reaction time were compared. It was found that both reaction time and the evokedpotential latency increases with decreasing stimulus intensity. However, different slopes of the curves were found. This is explained in terms of

The effect of stimulus intensity on brai
✍ Soile Komssi; Seppo KΓ€hkΓΆnen; Risto J. Ilmoniemi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 545 KB

## Abstract To better understand the neuronal effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we studied how the TMS‐evoked brain responses depend on stimulation intensity. We measured electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to motor‐cortex TMS, estimated the intensity dependence of the overall

Component-specific effects of physostigm
✍ Kenji Arakawa; Neal S. Peachey; Gastone G. Celesia; Guido Rubboli πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 574 KB

Pattern visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded from the pial surface of the cat primary visual cortex prior to and following the intravenous administration of physostigmine, an agent which blocks the enzyme responsible for the breakdown of synaptically released acetylcholine. The control VEP

Effect of stimulus field size and locali
✍ Osamu Katsumi; Tatsuo Hirose; Tsuyoshi Tanino πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1988 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 574 KB

The role of the central and peripheral stimulus fields on monocular and binocular amplitude and binocular summation of the pattern reversal visual evoked response were investigated. When the central stimulus field size was smaller than 2.4 degrees, there was no significant difference between the amp