Effect of particle size distribution on adsorption kinetics in stirred batch systems
β Scribed by David O. Cooney; Babafemi A. Adesanya; Anthony L. Hines
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 664 KB
- Volume
- 38
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2509
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstrac&The effect of different particle size distributions (PSD's) on kinetic behavior in stirred-batch adsorption systems was investigated by numerically modeling the uptake of p-nitrophenol from aqueous solution by granular activated carbon in a well-stirred batch type of environment. Four different Gaussian PSD's, two different log-normal PSD's and one case of uniform particle size were studied. The model accounted for both external and internal mass transfer resistances, and for the highly nonlinear equilibrium relation which characterizes the p-nitrophenollactivated carbon system. AU isotherm parameters and "base-case" kinetic parameters were experimentally determined values (from the literature). The kinetic parameter values were varied in some cases to assess their intluence. Moreover, both infinite-bath and finite-bath situations were evaluated. The modeling results show that the different particle size distributions did not generally give kinetic behavior widely different from the uniform particle size case when an infinite bath was assumed. However, for the more realistic case of a finite bath, the different PSD's gave significantly more distinctive results, especially for fractional mass uptake values greater than about 0.7. It is concluded that, in finite bath experiments, the nature of the adsorbent PSD must be accounted for in interpreting data obtained at fractional mass uptake values greater than about 0.7, unless the adsorbent PSD is reasonably narrow.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The rheological properties of aqueous polystyrene latex dispersions from three synthetic batches, with nearly the same z-average particle sizes, 400 nm, but varying degrees of polydispersity, 0.085, 0.301, and 0.485, respectively, were systematically investigated using steady-state shear and oscilla
On p. 539 (left-hand column) line 15 should be 1981a-c; Taylor, 1981a-c, 1982a, b; Taylor and Webb, 1981; Krishnamurthy. CD, in eq. (1) (p. 539) should be {C/6)&. On p. 539 (right-hand column) line 7 should be , . . consisting in the. In eq. (12) (p. 540) the ( )shouldbe( ).